Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
Published on: June 7, 2018
Large Exchange Bias Effect in Geometrically Frustrated Spin Glass Through High-Density Coherent Chemical Interfaces
Hankun Xu1, Sergii Khmelevskyi2, Wenjie Li3
1Institute of Solid State Chemistry and Department of Physical Chemistry, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China.
Abstract:
The pursuit of next-generation spintronic devices has focused heavily on compensated ferrimagnets and non-collinear antiferromagnets, thanks to their significant exchange bias (EB) effects and minimal stray fields. However, spin glass (SG) systems are reemerging as compelling candidates despite their historically weak EB responses and poorly understood pinning mechanisms. Herein, we report the discovery of a geometrically frustrated SG intermetal material (Mn32Co5In15) exhibiting large EB effects (∼0.3 T), achieved by engineering high-density coherent interfaces. Specifically, this material features a 3D interlaced structure consisting of frustrated antiferromagnetic (f-AFM) Mn-rich clusters and ferromagnetic-like (FML) In-dominant clusters, consistent with topological spin glass states. Using field-dependent neutron scattering combined with theoretical calculations, we established the first experimental evidence that the large EB arises from the local pinning of FML states within frozen, coherent f-AFM matrices. This pinning breaks the ergodicity inherent to typical SG systems, while spin polarization of FML clusters creates an energetically favorable anisotropic channel in response to external fields. These findings offer new possibilities for leveraging frustrated spin glasses as pivotal functional materials in spintronic devices.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Valence Bond Theory
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Trends in Lattice Energy: Ion Size and Charge
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are slanted or...

