Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Treating Low Back Pain in Failed Back Surgery Patients with Multicolumn-lead Spinal Cord Stimulation
Published on: June 26, 2018
Cost-Effectiveness of Differential Target Multiplexed Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of PSPS Type 1 from
Iris Smet1, Bart Billet2,3, Raf van Paesschen4
1Multidisciplinary Pain Clinic, VITAZ Hospitals, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.
Purpose:
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) using the Differential Target Multiplexed (DTM) waveform is an effective treatment for treating chronic neuropathic back and leg pain that is refractory to other interventions. The purpose of this research was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of this therapy in a population with Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 1 (PSPS T1) by updating an existing model with inputs from Belgian healthcare databases and Western European clinical data.
Patients And Methods:
A two-phase model was built using a 24-month decision tree followed by a 13-year Markov model. Model inputs were sourced from a recent European randomized controlled trial evaluating DTM-SCS for the treatment of PSPS T1, other published literature, and publicly available Belgian healthcare data. Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated using deterministic analysis. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the effect of individual model input parameters on results. Overall model uncertainty was tested using probabilistic sensitivity analysis.
Results:
The model estimated that DTM-SCS would be cost-effective versus conventional medical management (CMM) in 99.7% of 10,000 simulations, at an assumed willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000. DTM-SCS patients gained 1.29 QALYs compared to CMM patients, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €11,518 and an incremental net benefit (INB) that became positive at year 5. The base-case results remained robust in scenario analyses, which found that medication use, utilities associated with suboptimal and optimal pain relief, and the time horizon were the largest drivers of uncertainty in the model.
Conclusion:
The results of the model suggest that DTM-SCS is likely to be a cost-effective treatment option for PSPS T1 compared to CMM for patients in the Belgian healthcare system.

