Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the prevalence of...
Principle of Equivalence01:18

Principle of Equivalence

According to Albert Einstein (1897-1955), free-falling and feeling weightless are intrinsically linked. If a person were in free-fall under gravity, for example, diving towards the Earth from an airplane, they would feel completely weightless. Similarly, a person descending in a lift may feel partially weightless. Broadly speaking, it is assumed that an object in a uniform gravitational field and an object undergoing constant acceleration in the absence of gravity are under the same...
Equivalent Couples01:28

Equivalent Couples

In mechanical engineering, the concept of equivalent couples plays a crucial role in understanding and analyzing various mechanical systems.
Two couples are considered to be equivalent if they produce the same rotational effect on a rigid body. In other words, the two couples have the same magnitude and act in the same direction, causing the same angular displacement or acceleration in the body.
For instance, consider two couples lying in the plane of the page, with one having a pair of equal...
Categories of Equilibrium01:30

Categories of Equilibrium

Equilibrium is a crucial concept in physics, enabling us to understand how forces interact with bodies to produce no or constant motion. In two-dimensional equilibrium, force systems can be classified into different categories based on their characteristics.
One of the categories of equilibrium is collinear equilibrium, which involves forces acting along a straight line. This type of equilibrium requires only one force equation in the direction of the forces, as the other equations are...
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
Law of Rational Indices01:29

Law of Rational Indices

The Law of rational indices is a fundamental principle in the field of crystallography. According to this law, the intercepts of a crystal face along the crystallographic axes (the three-dimensional axes along which a crystal is measured) can be expressed as either equivalent to the unit intercepts (a, b, c) or simple whole number multiples of them. These multiples are typically denoted as na, n'b, and n''c, where n, n', and n'' are simple whole numbers.To illustrate, consider a crystal with...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spatiotemporal reconstruction of ancient road networks through sequential cost-benefit analysis.

PNAS nexus·2023
Same author

Multidimensional political apportionment.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2022
Same journal

Campaign contributions and policy divergence.

Social choice and welfare·2026
Same journal

The impact of timing and type of donation decision on charitable giving.

Social choice and welfare·2025
Same journal

Characterizing the top trading cycles rule for housing markets with lexicographic preferences when externalities are limited.

Social choice and welfare·2025
Same journal

Natural interviewing equilibria in matching settings.

Social choice and welfare·2025
Same journal

Approval-based shortlisting.

Social choice and welfare·2025
Same journal

United for change: deliberative coalition formation to change the status quo.

Social choice and welfare·2024
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Optimal impartial correspondences.

Javier Cembrano1, Felix Fischer2, Max Klimm3

  • 1Department of Algorithms and Complexity, Max-Planck-Institute für Informatik, Saarbrücken, Germany.

Social Choice and Welfare
|June 2, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces impartial mechanisms for agent selection based on nominations. It ensures selected agents receive many nominations, balancing selection size with fairness, even when nomination counts vary.

More Related Videos

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Computer Science
  • Game Theory
  • Social Choice Theory

Background:

  • Agent selection mechanisms are crucial in distributed systems and decision-making processes.
  • Fairness and efficiency are key considerations in designing such mechanisms.
  • Impartiality constraints ensure selection independence from an agent's own nominations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and analyze impartial mechanisms for selecting agents based on nominations.
  • To maximize the minimum number of nominations received by any selected agent.
  • To explore the trade-offs between the number of selected agents and nomination thresholds.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a novel selection mechanism with a bound on nominations per agent (d).
  • Analysis of the mechanism's impartiality and nomination guarantees.
  • Establishment of theoretical bounds and trade-offs for general cases without nomination limits.

Main Results:

  • A mechanism selects at most d+1 agents, ensuring they receive near-maximum nominations.
  • Proved that no impartial mechanism can guarantee only maximum-nomination recipients.
  • Established a trade-off: selecting k agents guarantees a minimum nomination count related to n/(k-1).

Conclusions:

  • The proposed mechanism offers an optimal balance between selection size and nomination fairness under constraints.
  • The findings highlight fundamental limitations of impartial selection mechanisms.
  • Provides a theoretical framework for understanding selection fairness in nominated systems.