Superplasticizers
Additives and Fillers in Concrete
Plasticizers
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Fabrication of a Bioactive, PCL-based "Self-fitting" Shape Memory Polymer Scaffold
Published on: October 23, 2015
Natalie Crutchfield1, Bryan M Grommersch2, Sama Ghalei1
1School of Chemical, Materials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA.
This review explores how multifunctional additives can improve PMMA bone cement, a material used for decades in orthopedic surgery. PMMA has issues like infection risk and poor thermal properties, which can harm surrounding tissues. Researchers have developed additives that address multiple problems at once, such as preventing infections and improving imaging visibility. These additives are being tested in clinical trials and show promise for better patient outcomes. The review summarizes current research and highlights the potential of these additives to enhance PMMA's performance in medical applications.
Area of Science:
Background:
PMMA bone cement has been used clinically for over half a century to secure implants or fill bone defects. It was originally developed for industrial applications before being adapted for medical use. Despite its widespread adoption, PMMA has notable limitations that affect clinical outcomes. These include implant loosening, susceptibility to infections, and mechanical mismatch with natural bone. The material's thermal properties also pose a risk of tissue necrosis during application. These challenges have motivated researchers to explore ways to enhance PMMA's performance. Prior studies have focused on modifying PMMA with various additives to address these issues. This paper builds on that foundation by reviewing recent developments in multifunctional additive strategies.
Purpose Of The Study:
The aim of this review is to summarize the current state of multifunctional additives for PMMA-based bone cements. The paper seeks to clarify how these additives can address multiple limitations of PMMA simultaneously. The motivation stems from the need to improve the clinical performance of PMMA in orthopedic applications. By integrating multiple functions into a single additive, researchers hope to achieve better outcomes in terms of mechanical strength and infection resistance. The study focuses on additives that have been tested in preclinical or clinical settings. It also highlights the transition of these technologies from laboratory research to clinical trials. The authors aim to provide a comprehensive overview of available and emerging additive strategies. This work is intended to guide future research and development in PMMA-based biomaterials.
Main Methods:
The authors conducted a systematic review of the literature on multifunctional additives for PMMA-based bone cements. They analyzed published studies that describe the use of additives with multiple functionalities. The review includes a qualitative synthesis of findings from various research groups. The authors categorized additives based on their primary functions and clinical relevance. They also examined how these additives interact with PMMA and affect its properties. The review includes data from in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies where applicable. The authors highlight the most promising additive types currently under investigation. They conclude with insights into the clinical translation of these multifunctional additives.
Main Results:
The review identifies several multifunctional additives that improve PMMA's mechanical and biological properties. These additives often combine antimicrobial, radiopaque, and bioactive functions in a single component. Some additives reduce the risk of infection while enhancing radiopacity for better imaging. Others improve thermal stability to prevent tissue necrosis during cement application. Additives containing antibiotics or antimicrobial agents have shown reduced bacterial colonization in in vitro models. Certain additives also increase the cement's radiopacity without compromising mechanical strength. The authors report that some additives have reached clinical trial stages. These findings suggest that multifunctional additives can address multiple PMMA limitations simultaneously.
Conclusions:
The authors conclude that multifunctional additives represent a promising approach to overcoming PMMA's clinical limitations. These additives can simultaneously address issues like infection, mechanical mismatch, and thermal damage. The review highlights the importance of additive design in achieving multiple benefits. The authors note that some additives have advanced to clinical testing, indicating progress in translating research into practice. They emphasize the need for further studies to optimize additive formulations and application methods. The authors suggest that future work should focus on long-term clinical outcomes and biocompatibility. They also call for more standardized testing protocols to evaluate multifunctional additives. The findings underscore the potential of these additives to enhance PMMA's clinical utility.
Multifunctional additives are compounds added to PMMA to improve multiple properties, such as antimicrobial activity and mechanical strength.
They reduce infection risk, increase radiopacity, and enhance thermal stability during cement application.
Thermal stability prevents tissue necrosis caused by the exothermic reaction during PMMA cement setting.
Radiopaque additives allow better imaging of the cement in X-rays without affecting mechanical properties.
Some additives have reached clinical trial stages, but widespread clinical use is still under investigation.
The authors suggest these additives can address multiple PMMA limitations and are advancing toward clinical translation.