A Qualitative Analysis of Factors Contributing to Cervical Cancer Screening Implementation in Health Care Facilities

Laura M Bogart1,2, Laura Whitaker1, Violet Gwokyalya3

  • 1RAND, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

IntroductionCervical cancer prevalence and incidence are high in sub-Saharan Africa, especially in Uganda, where screening rates are low, despite government policy recommending screening for all women aged 25-49 every three years. Most prior research focuses on client-related barriers to screening, including women's fears about the screening procedure, lack of partner support, and community-level stigma. Fewer studies elaborate on inner context factors related to health care systems, facilities, and providers. The aim of this study was to use qualitative methods to explore inner context factors that may affect cervical cancer screening in Uganda.MethodsWe recruited 20 health care facility administrators, 6 providers of cervical cancer screening, 2 district health officers, 2 division medical officers, and one government health official for key informant interviews, and 69 women (31 screened and 38 not screened for cervical cancer) for focus group discussions. Participants were recruited from four health care facilities that varied by urbanicity and funding source: one urban public facility, one urban private non-profit facility, one rural public facility, and one rural private non-profit facility.ResultsInner context themes emerged around infrastructure needs (insufficient space, equipment, and supplies) and staffing issues (inadequate staff quantity and training), which contributed to lower quality of care (e.g., long wait-times; painful, rushed exams). Women described privacy concerns as well as discomfort with male and young providers. Women with HIV were prioritized for screening based on funding streams and inability to serve all women given infrastructure and staffing issues. Despite barriers, many stakeholders were committed to providing cervical cancer screening services, and many women saw the value of screening.ConclusionThis study identified inner context barriers related to resource shortfalls, which affected quality of care. Low cost solutions are needed to improve health care readiness and increase reach of cervical cancer screening in Uganda.

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
Principles of Disease Surveillance01:26

Principles of Disease Surveillance

Disease surveillance is the systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of health data essential to the planning, implementation, and evaluation of public health practice. This process integrates data dissemination to entities responsible for preventing and controlling disease, injury, and disability. Surveillance systems provide crucial information for action, helping public health authorities make informed decisions to manage and prevent outbreaks, ensure public safety, optimize...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures01:22

Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures

Essential infection prevention measures are based on the knowledge of the infection chain, the modes of transmission in healthcare settings, and the use of the best practices in all healthcare settings. Compulsory public reporting of healthcare-associated infection rates is needed to allow individuals and the community to make informed choices regarding selecting a healthcare facility.
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Preventive Healthcare Services01:30

Preventive Healthcare Services

Preventive healthcare services keep people healthy via frequent check-ups, screening, and counseling. They primarily aid in disease prevention rather than treating an acute or chronic illness. Preventive treatment also keeps individuals productive and energetic, allowing them to work well into their retirement years. Examples of preventive care services include:
Primary Healthcare Services01:30

Primary Healthcare Services

Primary care promotes wellness and prevents disease. This care includes health promotion, education, protection (such as immunizations), early disease screening, and environmental considerations. Settings providing this type of healthcare include physician offices, public health clinics, school nursing, and community health nursing.
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...