Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Development of a Benchtop Model for Evaluating the Compatibility of Wound Dressing Materials with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Systems
Published on: May 2, 2025
Development of an evaluation indicator system for wound care quality based on the structure-process-outcome model: a
Yinfeng Hu1, Caifei Li2, Liqiong Zhou3
1Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, South China Hospital, Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
A new wound care quality evaluation system was developed using the structure-process-outcome model. This scientifically rigorous system includes 3 levels and 25 indicators to objectively assess wound management quality in clinical settings.
Area of Science:
- Nursing
- Healthcare Quality Management
- Chronic Wound Care
Background:
- Rising incidence of chronic wounds (e.g., diabetic foot ulcers, pressure injuries) due to population aging and increased chronic diseases.
- Limitations of traditional wound care assessments: isolated indicators, lack of systematic monitoring, and incomplete evaluation.
- Need for a comprehensive, evidence-based system for standardized nursing management in wound care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a clinically applicable wound care quality evaluation indicator system tailored to China's healthcare context.
- To promote standardized practices and enhance the quality of wound care services.
- To integrate key elements and multidimensional factors using the structure-process-outcome framework.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the structure-process-outcome model for system development.
- Literature review, theoretical analysis, and semi-structured interviews to identify initial indicators.
- Two rounds of expert consultations (27 experts each) using mean ± SD, coefficient of variation, and Kendall's W for analysis.
- Analytic Hierarchy Process employed to determine indicator weights.
Main Results:
- Achieved 100% response rates in two rounds of expert surveys with high authority coefficients (0.874, 0.889).
- Demonstrated improving expert consensus, with Kendall's W coefficients ranging from 0.169-0.192.
- Established a final indicator system comprising 3 first-level, 9 second-level, and 25 third-level indicators.
Conclusions:
- The developed indicator system is scientifically rigorous, reliable, and theoretically applicable for objectively assessing wound management quality.
- The system aligns with clinical wound care practices and nursing management.
- Further validation through clinical pilot studies is necessary to confirm practical operability and real-world applicability.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Evaluation
Section...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

