Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026
E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Understanding Patient and Gastroenterologist Preferences at the Time of Treatment Escalation to First-Line Advanced
Stefan Schreiber1, Alissa Walsh2, Peter Hur3
1Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Background:
With guidelines recommending earlier advanced therapy (AT) use after 5-ASA failure for patients with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (UC), it is important to explore treatment preferences at the point of escalation to first-line AT.
Methods:
A web-based discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey was administered to AT-naïve patients with moderately-to-severely active UC and gastroenterologists in 5 European countries. Treatment attributes included time until symptom improvement, probability of remission and corticosteroid-free remission, risks of cancer, serious infection, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and mode of administration. Preference weights, relative attribute importance (RAI), and maximum acceptable risk were estimated. A latent class analysis explored preference heterogeneity.
Results:
Probability of remission at 1 year was the most important attribute for patients (N = 514; RAI = 45.3%) and gastroenterologists (N = 397; RAI = 48.5%). Five-year cancer risk was the second most important attribute for patients (RAI = 11.8%) and third for gastroenterologists (RAI = 10.9%). RAI of MACE was higher for patients than gastroenterologists (10.6% vs. 6.8%). Both were willing to accept risks for increased probability of remission. Latent class analysis identified 4 groups of patients and 2 groups of gastroenterologists with distinct preferences. The relative importance of efficacy was higher compared with safety in latent classes representing 80% of patients.
Conclusion:
Clinical remission was most important to patients and gastroenterologists, and both were willing to accept some risk in exchange for the benefits of AT. However, some heterogeneity in preferences was observed. To support patient-centered, guideline-concordant care, gastroenterologists should discuss escalation to AT with patients not well-controlled on conventional therapy, incorporating individual preferences through shared decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
01:29Drugs for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis in IBD
01:30Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the colonic...
01:21Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
01:26Peptic Ulcer Disease IV: Management
The therapeutic approach involves ensuring adequate rest, implementing drug therapy, promoting smoking cessation, making dietary modifications, and emphasizing long-term follow-up care.
Pharmacological management
The prevailing therapy for peptic ulcers involves a combination of managing the patient's current medication...
01:29Inflammatory Bowel Disease IV: Pharmacological Management
Pharmacologic...
01:28Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.