Airborne particle dynamics during draping of a surgical microscope versus an exoscope in spinal surgery: A

Yuki Umeno1, Eiji Abe2, Takeshi Hara2

  • 1Nursing Division, [Operating Room], Juntendo University Hospital, Japan.

Abstract

Insights

Exoscope draping generated fewer airborne particles initially compared to surgical microscopes, suggesting device setup influences contamination risk. Controlled draping practices can enhance operating room safety.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical technology
  • Operating room environmental monitoring
  • Infection control

Background:

  • Exoscopes offer ergonomic and visualization benefits over traditional surgical microscopes.
  • The impact of device draping on airborne particle generation during setup is understudied.
  • Airborne particles are a potential source of surgical site contamination.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare airborne particle generation during the draping of surgical microscopes and exoscopes.
  • To investigate the influence of device type on transient airborne particulate dynamics.
  • To assess the contribution of draping procedures to operating room contamination.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective observational study in a laminar airflow operating room.
  • Comparison of surgical microscope (Pentero) and exoscope (Orbeye) draping during 10 spinal surgeries.
  • Airborne particle counts (0.5 μm and 1.0 μm) measured at 5-second intervals for 1 minute post-drape initiation.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in cumulative particle exposure between exoscopes and microscopes.
  • Exoscope draping showed a trend towards lower 0.5 μm particle exposure (AUC).
  • A significant time-by-device interaction for 0.5 μm particles indicated lower initial counts with exoscopes.

Conclusions:

  • Transient airborne particle behavior during draping is device-dependent.
  • Device configuration and draping mechanics influence particle generation.
  • Controlled draping and awareness of device-specific airflow can mitigate contamination risk.