Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026
Endoscopic Endonasal Trans-sphenoidal Approach: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Pituitary Adenomas
Published on: January 17, 2018
Safety and Efficacy of Expedited Discharge Protocols After Endoscopic Endonasal Pituitary Surgery: A Single-Center
Daniel N de Souza1, Spencer Frome1, Qing Wen1
1Department of Neurosurgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Background And Objectives:
Little is known about how accelerated discharge strategies compare with established enhanced recovery pathways after endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an accelerated discharge protocol after EES.
Methods:
This was a retrospective analysis of adults who underwent EES for pituitary adenomas at a single academic center between 2012 and 2025. Patients were managed under 1 of 4 postoperative pathways dependent on year of surgery: (1) No institutional protocol; (2) First-generation recovery protocol; (3) Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS); and (4) Expedited one-day discharge. Demographic and clinical variables were extracted from the electronic medical record using automated natural-language-processing methods. Primary outcomes were length of stay (LOS) and 30-day all-cause readmission or reoperation. All data processing, visualization, and statistical analyses were performed using Python version 3.12.
Results:
Six hundred patients who underwent 630 surgeries were included. Median LOS was 3 days, with a 30-day readmission rate of 14.3% and a 30-day postdischarge reoperation rate of 2.5%. LOS differed significantly across protocol eras, with progressively shorter hospital stays observed over time and the shortest median stay occurring under the expedited discharge protocol (P < .0001). Readmission rates were highest in the preprotocol (16.2%) and initial protocol periods (17.2%), declining to 8.3% under the ERAS protocol and 10.0% under the expedited discharge protocol (P = .039). 30-day postdischarge reoperation rates did not statistically differ across protocols. In multivariate analyses, both the ERAS (rate ratio = 0.899, P = .021) and expedited discharge protocols (rate ratio = 0.819, P = .024) demonstrated significantly shorter hospital stays compared with the preprotocol era, without differences in 30-day readmission or reoperation rates.
Conclusion:
The expedited discharge protocol safely shortened hospital stays without increasing 30-day readmissions or reoperations. These findings support the feasibility of accelerated postoperative pathways after EES. Broad adoption has the potential to produce substantial resource savings without compromising patient safety.
