Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...
Introduction to Test of Independence01:21

Introduction to Test of Independence

In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Developing a Set of Core Patient-Reported Outcomes for Kidney Replacement Therapy: A Modified Delphi Study.

Journal of renal care·2026
Same author

The carbon footprint of surgical and non-surgical skin cancer appointments.

Clinical and experimental dermatology·2026
Same author

Under-25s show the clearest post-2021 rebound in mental health: HILDA 2001-2024.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
Same author

Further Findings on the Intergenerational Transmission of Alcohol Consumption.

Health economics·2026
Same author

Preferences for healthcare decisional control in older people with chronic kidney disease in the UK indicate strong inclinations towards active and collaborative approaches.

Clinical kidney journal·2026
Same author

Using linked administrative data: Insights and tips from academic clinical trialists.

Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia·2026
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Cluster Trials Inference With CARE.

Sergey Alexeev1,2, Rachael L Morton2

  • 1Nura Gili: Centre for Indigenous Programs, Co-Design Health Research and Innovation Team, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.

Statistics in Medicine
|June 4, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cluster-randomized trials often have hidden size and structure variations that skew results. A new CARE protocol offers a better way to analyze these complex clinical trials for more reliable findings.

Keywords:
assumption sensitivitycluster‐randomized clinical trialscluster‐robust inferencejackknife variance estimatormodel robustnesspragmatic design

More Related Videos

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Public Health Research

Background:

  • Cluster-randomized trials (CRTs), particularly pragmatic ones, frequently display significant, often overlooked, heterogeneity in cluster sizes and structures.
  • This imbalance can distort statistical inference, compromising the validity of trial results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the underappreciated impact of cluster size and structure heterogeneity in CRTs.
  • To evaluate the performance of existing statistical methods under such conditions.
  • To introduce a novel protocol for more robust CRT analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Simulations involving reassigning treatment in real data to assess heterogeneity effects.
  • Analysis of synthetic data with varying levels of imbalance.
  • Comparison of current methods (e.g., targeted maximum likelihood estimation, generalized estimating equations) against proposed benchmarks.

Main Results:

  • Current standard methods demonstrate suboptimal performance when faced with substantial cluster heterogeneity.
  • The proposed CARE (Clarify, Apply, Refine, Evaluate) protocol provides a more reliable framework for inference.
  • The CARE protocol anchors analysis in a design-based benchmark, improving credibility.

Conclusions:

  • Substantial heterogeneity in cluster size and structure is a critical, yet often underestimated, issue in cluster-randomized trials.
  • Existing analytical methods require re-evaluation for their suitability in the presence of significant imbalance.
  • The CARE protocol offers a transparent and principled approach to enhance the credibility and comparability of CRT analyses.