Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

In Vivo, Percutaneous, Needle Based, Optical Coherence Tomography of Renal Masses
Published on: March 30, 2015
Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient in subtyping renal cell
Hira Lal1, Pinky Jowel2, Pragati Verma3
1Department of Radiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, Uttar Pradesh, India. hiralal2007@yahoo.co.in.
Background:
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) has emerged as a non-contrast functional imaging technique for renal mass characterization. Its role in differentiating histopathological subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains an area of active investigation.
Aim:
To evaluate the role of DWI and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in differentiating histopathological subtypes of RCC.
Methods:
In this prospective observational study, 127 patients with histopathologically proven RCC who underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including DWI were analyzed. Diffusion-weighted imaging was performed using b values of 0 second/mm2 and 1000 seconds/mm2, and ADC maps were generated. ADC values were measured from solid tumor components and compared among RCC subtypes. Statistical analysis included subgroup comparisons and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to assess the ability of ADC values to differentiate clear cell RCC (ccRCC) from non-ccRCC.
Results:
Of the 127 RCCs, 97 (76.4%) were ccRCC, 24 (18.9%) papillary RCC, and 6 (4.7%) chromophobe RCC. The mean ADC value of ccRCC [(1.391 ± 0.271) × 10-3 mm2/second] was significantly higher than that of papillary RCC [(0.876 ± 0.293) × 10-3 mm2/second; P < 0.001] and chromophobe RCC [(1.059 ± 0.369) × 10-3 mm2/second; P = 0.04]. No significant difference was observed between papillary and chromophobe RCC (P = 0.396). When grouped, ccRCC demonstrated a significantly higher mean ADC value compared with non-ccRCC [(1.391 ± 0.271) × 10-3 mm2/second vs (0.915 ± 0.312) × 10-3 mm2/second; P < 0.001]. Receiver operating characteristic analysis yielded an area under the curve of 0.889 (95% confidence interval: 0.804-0.975). An ADC threshold of 1.08 × 10-3 mm2/second achieved 90% sensitivity and 83% specificity for identifying ccRCC.
Conclusion:
DWI with quantitative ADC analysis reliably differentiates clear cell from non-ccRCC and demonstrates significant correlation with RCC subtype and tumor grade. DWI serves as a valuable adjunct to conventional MRI, particularly in patients with contraindications to contrast administration.
More Related Videos
12:22The Use of Reverse Phase Protein Arrays (RPPA) to Explore Protein Expression Variation within Individual Renal Cell Cancers
Published on: January 22, 2013
15:48Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014