Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
Published on: September 28, 2022
Face-to-face or screen-to-screen: gynecologic oncology fellowship interview applicant perspectives on interview
Christopher M Mayer1, Natasha McGlaun1, Simone A Sasse2
1Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Background:
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, in 2020 the medical community modified residency and fellowship interview processes to a virtual-only format. The 2023 application cycle marked the first year that any gynecologic oncology fellowship interviews returned to an in-person format with two programs conducting in-person interviews.
Objective:
This study evaluated the perspectives of gynecologic oncology fellowship applicants on in-person and virtual interview formats to inform programs' decision-making around future interview cycles.
Methods:
Applicant lists from three gynecologic oncology fellowship programs were compiled from the 2023 application cycle. An anonymous survey regarding applicant perspectives on the interview process was electronically distributed.
Results:
There was a 56% (47/86) response rate. Applicants applied to a median of 50 programs (IQR 42-60), accepted 24 interviews (IQR 20-32), declined 4 interviews (IQR 2-9), and attended 24 interviews (IQR 17-24). Thirty (64%) applicants attended at least one in-person interview. Among the 30 applicants who experienced both interview formats, in-person interviews resulted in a better understanding of the program's geography, culture, and hospital facilities (p < 0.0001). Applicants who attended in-person interviews were more satisfied with their interview experience, found it easier to interpret body language, and were better able to connect with other applicants and form personal connections with interviewers (p < 0.0001). Of applicants who experienced both formats, 53% preferred in-person format.
Conclusion:
Applicants who participated in both interview formats reported higher satisfaction and connected better with other applicants and interviewers with in-person interviews; however, there was only a slight (53%) preference for in-person format.
Related Concept Videos
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination
Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing
This therapeutic technique can also be used when a patient brings up pertinent information during a health-related conversation. The...
Group Therapy
Clinical Trials: Overview