Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026
Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Intratumoral Injection of Cisplatin for the Treatment of Isolated Mediastinal Recurrence of Lung Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2017
First-Line Serplulimab in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: Secondary Analysis of the ASTRUM-005 Phase 3
Jingjing Liu1, Liang Han2, Lin Wu3
1Department of Oncology, Jilin Cancer Hospital, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Importance:
The ASTRUM-005 phase 3 randomized clinical trial showed substantial survival benefit from adding serplulimab to chemotherapy for previously untreated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, the long-term outcomes are unclear.
Objective:
To investigate the efficacy, safety, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and exploratory biomarker findings from ASTRUM-005 at an extended follow-up.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This international, double-blind, phase 3 randomized clinical trial enrolled patients from September 12, 2019, to April 27, 2021 in China, Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Turkey, and Georgia. Eligible patients had histologically or cytologically confirmed ES-SCLC with no prior systemic therapy. Patients were followed up through May 7, 2024, and the data analysis of this prespecified, secondary analysis lasted from August to September 2024. The median follow-up duration was 42.4 months (range, 0.2-55.2).
Exposures:
Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive intravenous serplulimab (4.5 mg/kg; serplulimab group) or placebo (placebo group), which was combined with up to 4 cycles of carboplatin and etoposide every 3 weeks.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included other efficacy end points, safety, and PROs.
Results:
A total of 585 patients (median [range] age was 63 [28-76] years in the serplulimab group and 62 [31-83] years in the placebo group) with previously untreated ES-SCLC, and 389 (66.5%) were randomly assigned to the serplulimab group and 196 (33.5%) to the placebo group. Baseline characteristics were balanced across treatment groups. At data cutoff, 280 OS events (72.0%) in the serplulimab group and 166 (84.7%) in the placebo group were observed. Compared with the placebo group, the serplulimab group showed more favorable efficacy (median OS, 15.8 [95% CI, 13.9-17.4] vs 11.1 [95% CI, 10.0-12.4] months; hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.49-0.73; P < .001). The serplulimab group showed improved OS rates at 4 years compared with the placebo group (21.9% vs 7.2%). Grade 3 or higher serplulimab-related or placebo-related treatment-emergent adverse events occurred for 136 (35.0%) and 57 patients (29.1%) in the respective groups. A PRO analysis revealed consistent trends of improved overall health, dyspnea, and pain in both groups and faster recovery from alopecia in the serplulimab group.
Conclusions And Relevance:
This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial demonstrated long-term benefit from adding serplulimab to chemotherapy for previously untreated patients with ES-SCLC, supporting this therapy as a first-line standard of care for this patient population.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04063163.
