Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

03:14
Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
Published on: December 6, 2024
Improving Radiology Report Error Detection Using a Multipass Large Language Model: Framework Development and
Songsoo Kim1, Seungtae Lee2, See Young Lee3
1Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
JMIR Medical Informatics
|June 4, 2026
Summary
An optimized multipass large language model (LLM) framework significantly improved precision and cost-efficiency for radiology report error detection. This AI-radiologist collaboration offers a scalable solution for quality assurance in radiology.
Area of Science:
- Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging
- Radiology Quality Assurance
- Natural Language Processing in Healthcare
Background:
- Large language models (LLMs) for radiology report proofreading often produce numerous false positives (FPs) due to the low error rates in clinical data.
- This limitation hinders the practical application of LLMs for automated quality assurance in radiology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate an optimized LLM framework designed to enhance precision and cost-efficiency in detecting errors within radiology reports.
- To determine if the proposed framework could maintain or improve error detection capabilities while reducing false positives.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 1000 radiology reports across various modalities (radiography, ultrasonography, CT, MRI) from the MIMIC-III database.
- Evaluation of three LLM frameworks: single-prompt detector, report extractor plus single-prompt detector, and a multipass framework with an FP verifier.
- Assessment of precision using positive predictive value (PPV) and error detection rates, alongside estimation of model inference and reviewer labor costs.
Main Results:
- The multipass LLM framework (framework 3) demonstrated a significant increase in PPV (0.159) compared to single-prompt frameworks (0.063-0.079).
- Human review burden was reduced by over 50% (from 192 to 88 reports per 1000), and model inference costs decreased by up to 42.6%.
- Remaining FPs were primarily associated with complex clinical context, indicating a shift from structural errors to nuanced discrepancies.
Conclusions:
- The optimized multipass LLM framework effectively improves precision and cost-efficiency for radiology report error detection in low-prevalence settings.
- This approach facilitates a synergistic AI-radiologist collaboration, offering a scalable and cost-effective solution for AI-assisted quality assurance in radiology.
- The framework enables a targeted human-in-the-loop workflow by filtering out simple errors, allowing human reviewers to focus on complex cases.
Related Concept Videos
Improving Translational Accuracy
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Improving Translational Accuracy
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...