Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Reproductive identity expression, reinforcement and defence: A constructivist grounded theory of non‑normative
Anna-Marie Madeley1, Sarah Earle2, Lindsay O'Dell3
1Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes. MK7 6AA, United Kingdom; PRESENT ADDRESS City St George's, University of London, Department of Nursing and Midwifery, School of Health and Medical Sciences, City St George's, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB United Kingdom.
Background:
Increasingly, women in the United Kingdom decline routine or recommended maternity care, give birth outside clinical guidelines, or make other non-normative choices. Despite policy commitments to personalised, rights-based care, such decisions often generate anxiety within maternity systems. Understanding women's motivations is essential for safe, rights-respecting care and informed policy. Existing approaches are predominantly shaped by clinician and system perspectives, often assuming motivations without evidence from women themselves. Current evidence frequently reduces lived experiences to discrete phenomena, trauma, or media narratives, failing to capture their complexity and underlying motivations AIM: To develop a substantive theory explaining how and why women make non-normative maternity decisions in the UK METHODS: Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory methodology was applied, incorporating all core methodological components FINDINGS: The Theory of Reproductive Identity Expression, Reinforcement and Defence explains how tacit and overt reproductive identities shape non-normative childbearing decisions. Four interrelated categories show how choices express, reinforce, or defend identity in response to institutional pressures, coercion, stigmatisation, and power dynamics. Decisions were intentional, values-driven, and informed, often arising from perceived or experienced threats to bodily autonomy and from disrespectful care CONCLUSION: Non-normative decisions highlight persistent misalignment between women's reproductive identities and system priorities. They frequently serve to assert, reinforce, or defend identity against institutional constraints. The national maternity strategy must continue to recognise women's rights to decline care and to exercise informed choice, while providing practical strategies to operationalise personalised, rights-based care amid contemporary systemic challenges.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
The Nativist Approach
Role-Based Identity
Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth. This guiding role...
Horney's Sociocultural Approach

