Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026
Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Comparison of the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgery for osteosarcoma: A target trial
Guodong Zhong1, Honglin Gu2, Zijun Huo3
1Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Orthopedics and Traumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Introduction:
Most studies recommend a treatment sequence involving neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC first) for osteosarcoma, yet direct comparisons with upfront surgery (surgery first) are lacking, and previous comparative analyses revealed no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the two strategies.
Materials And Methods:
Using the target trial emulation (TTE) framework and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we compared NAC first versus surgery first in patients with osteosarcoma. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were employed to control for baseline confounding. The primary analysis aimed to estimate the intention-to-treat (ITT) effect to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of which initial treatment strategy is associated with a better prognosis.
Results:
Among 831 eligible patients, 152 were assigned to the surgery-first group, and 679 were assigned to the NAC-first group. After PSM (121 pairs), the NAC-first group had significantly higher 5-year OS (77.7% [95% CI: 70.6%-85.5%] versus 61.3% [95% CI: 53.0%-70.8%], p = 0.006) and an increased risk of death in the surgery-first group (HR = 1.907, 95% CI: 1.172-3.103; p = 0.009). ITT and per-protocol (PP) analyses consistently corroborated these findings. IPTW analysis of the entire cohort showed a non-significant trend toward improved survival with NAC first (HR = 1.084, 95% CI: 0.992-1.186; p = 0.076).
Conclusion:
This study is the first to employ the TTE framework to compare treatment sequences for osteosarcoma. Our findings suggest that initiating treatment with NAC is associated with increased OS rates compared with initiating treatment with upfront surgery, providing empirical evidence that aligns with current recommendation in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines.
