Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

08:50
Thrombus Profiling Assay: A Microfluidics-Based Platform for Comprehensively Characterizing Biomechanical Thrombogenesis
Published on: January 9, 2026
Making Machine Learning Clinically Useful in Thrombosis and Hemostasis: A Roadmap for Diagnostic Translation
Michael Nagler1,2, Henning Nilius1, Janna Hastings3
1Inselspital Universitatsspital Bern, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Switzerland, Bern.
Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis
|June 4, 2026
Summary
Machine learning (ML) shows promise in medicine, particularly in thrombosis and hemostasis. Treating ML tools as diagnostic instruments is key to assessing their clinical usefulness and guiding translation for patient care.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Clinical Pathology
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Background:
- Artificial intelligence (AI), especially machine learning (ML), holds significant promise for transforming healthcare, including the fields of thrombosis and hemostasis.
- Clinical decisions in these areas often involve integrating multiple data points, making them suitable for AI-driven decision support.
- Despite growing interest and research, the practical application of ML tools in routine clinical decision-making remains limited, with many models being early-stage prototypes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a framework for translating machine learning (ML) tools into clinically useful diagnostic instruments in medicine.
- To provide a roadmap for assessing the clinical utility, transportability, and safe deployment of ML models.
- To guide clinicians and laboratory specialists in distinguishing between promising ML prototypes and clinically ready tools.
Main Methods:
- Framing ML tools as diagnostic instruments to define and assess clinical usefulness.
- Developing a roadmap for diagnostic translation, covering intended use, data, validation, implementation, and governance.
- Utilizing figures to illustrate the translation roadmap and map ML to laboratory processes.
- Employing a checklist for structured evaluation of published ML studies.
Main Results:
- The review proposes treating ML tools as diagnostic instruments to clarify their clinical utility at the bedside.
- A comprehensive roadmap is outlined for the translation of ML tools from development to clinical implementation.
- Guidance is provided for evaluating the readiness of ML tools for sustainable use in clinical practice.
Conclusions:
- The diagnostic instrument framework offers a practical approach to achieving and assessing the clinical usefulness of ML tools.
- A structured roadmap is essential for the successful translation and implementation of ML in clinical settings, particularly in thrombosis and hemostasis.
- Clinicians and laboratory specialists need clear criteria to differentiate between early-stage ML prototypes and deployable clinical decision support tools.
