Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Assessing professional ethics in midwifery educators: development and validation of a specialized instrument
Atieh Adibzadeh1, Tahmineh Farajkhoda2, Mahsa Khoshnam Rad3
1Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
Background:
Assessing the professional ethics of midwifery educators is crucial for ensuring high-quality education and patient care. However, a comprehensive and validated instrument specific to this context is lacking, despite the unique ethical demands of their dual role in academia and clinical practice.
Aim:
To develop and psychometrically validate a comprehensive, context-specific instrument to assess professional ethics among midwifery educators.
Design:
A sequential mixed-methods design.
Method:
A sequential mixed-methods study was conducted across midwifery education settings in three phases. Item generation involved a literature synthesis and consultations with five midwifery faculty members, yielding an initial pool of 67 items. Content validity was assessed by panels of midwifery experts and students (n = 20) using the Content Validity Ratio (CVR), with a critical value of ≥ 0.62 for item retention; this process resulted in the removal of 10 items, leaving 57 items for psychometric testing. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed with 200 students, leading to the removal of 2 items and the identification of a six-domain structure. Following reliability analysis, an additional 3 items were omitted. The final 52-item instrument demonstrates strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.94) and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.97), and requires 10-15 min to complete.
Results:
A total of 225 participants were included across the phases (response rate: 100%). The qualitative phase identified four core categories and twelve sub-categories. Following content validation, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the 57-item version led to the removal of 2 items and supported a robust six-factor structure. The final instrument comprises 52 items. The scale demonstrated excellent sampling adequacy (KMO = 0.978), strong internal consistency (α = 0.94), and high test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.97).
Conclusion:
This study provides a preliminary 52-item instrument with strong initial psychometric properties for assessing professional ethics in midwifery educators. It serves as a sound tool for evaluation and faculty development, aiming to enhance ethical competencies. Further studies are needed to establish other psychometric properties, such as discriminant and cross-cultural validity.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Code of Ethics
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's cancer...
Nursing Ethical Principles I
Autonomy
Autonomy underscores the significance of a patient's self-determination and freedom from external control. In healthcare, respecting the...
Professional Values
The values that are the foundation of the nursing profession are altruism, autonomy, human dignity, and social justice.
First, altruism refers to the concern for the welfare and well-being of others without personal...
Ethical Standards I
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...