Toddler Track: Streamlining Developmental Assessments-A Retrospective Cohort Study

Naomi Campbell-Woods1,2, Sarah Atkinson1,2, Jessica Balfour-Ogilvy3

  • 1Child Development Service - South, Browns Plains Community Health Centre, Hillcrest, Queensland, Australia.

Insights

The Toddler Track Model (TTM) significantly reduced wait times and assessment duration for developmental services in children aged 18 months to 3 years 11 months. This novel care model improved service capacity without compromising diagnostic outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Pediatrics
  • Healthcare Management
  • Service Delivery Models

Background:

  • Specialist outpatient developmental assessment services face challenges with long wait times and lengthy assessment durations.
  • Efficient service delivery is crucial for timely diagnosis and intervention in toddlers with developmental concerns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To design, implement, and evaluate the Toddler Track Model (TTM) for developmental assessment.
  • To determine if TTM reduces wait times and assessment completion time.
  • To assess the impact of TTM on the formulation of developmental profiles.

Main Methods:

  • The Toddler Track Model (TTM) utilized a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) framework for service redesign.
  • Children aged 18 months to 3 years 11 months were triaged into four streams with tailored pathways.
  • Outcomes were measured via retrospective chart audit comparing pre- and post-TTM implementation metrics.

Main Results:

  • Average time from initial clinical session to diagnostic formulation decreased from 116 to 63 days (p < 0.001).
  • Service-wide wait times declined by 61.5%, with TTM contributing an estimated 68% of this reduction.
  • Service capacity increased, with a substantial rise in the number of children assessed, without changes in diagnostic outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • The Toddler Track Model (TTM) is an effective novel care model for toddler developmental assessments.
  • TTM successfully reduced wait times and assessment duration, enhancing service capacity.
  • The model maintained clinical practice standards and diagnostic outcome consistency.
Abstract