Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

07:31
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Real-world implementation and predictive performance of suicide prediction models: A systematic review and
KangHyun Kim1, JuHee Kim1, Myung-Gwan Kim1
1Department of Biomedical Informatics, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, South Korea.
Digital Health
|June 5, 2026
Summary
Machine learning models for suicide risk prediction demonstrate good real-world accuracy. However, performance varies significantly, and factors like outcome type or model complexity do not clearly explain these differences.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Informatics
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Mental Health Research
Background:
- Machine learning (ML) models show potential for suicide risk prediction.
- Real-world performance and reasons for variation in ML suicide prediction models are not well understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically evaluate the real-world discriminative ability of statistical and ML suicide prediction models.
- To identify factors contributing to performance variations in these models.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of studies on suicide prediction models in clinical settings.
- Random-effects meta-analyses to pool the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
- Exploratory meta-regression and sensitivity analyses to investigate heterogeneity.
Main Results:
- Nine studies with 20 evaluations were included, showing an overall pooled AUC of 0.849.
- Pooled AUCs for suicide attempts, ideation, and death were 0.865, 0.835, and 0.842, respectively.
- Extreme heterogeneity (I² = 99.9%) was observed, with no clear associations found for outcome type, evaluation timing, or model type.
Conclusions:
- Suicide prediction models exhibit good real-world discrimination but substantial performance variability.
- No clear evidence suggests outcome type, evaluation timing, or model type explains this heterogeneity.
- Emphasizes the need for rigorous local validation and implementation tailored to clinical workflows.