Related Concept Videos
00:59Uncertainty: Overview
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
00:59Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
03:37Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
00:54Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...
01:10Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...
04:08The Uncertainty Principle
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He mathematically...
You might also read
Related Articles
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Sort by
Same author
Latent subdimensions of anxiety and depression differentially influence exertion of effort in pursuit of reward versus avoidance of threat.
Translational psychiatry·2026
Same author
Dopamine dynamics in human anterior cingulate cortex during Pavlovian-instrumental conflict.
bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2026
09:07
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
Published on: September 16, 2015
Uncertainty for better and worse.
1MPI for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany; University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
|June 5, 2026
Summary
Uncertainty drives learning and discovery by presenting both opportunities and threats. This review explores its behavioral impacts, balancing risk-averse and risk-seeking choices, and examines its role in exploration and decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Science
- Behavioral Economics
- Decision Theory
Background:
- Uncertainty is a fundamental aspect of life, influencing learning, discovery, and threat perception.
- Understanding uncertainty's role is crucial for navigating complex environments and making informed decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review recent research on the nature and behavioral consequences of uncertainty.
- To contextualize these findings within risk-averse and risk-seeking decision-making frameworks.
- To explore the dual role of uncertainty in driving exploration and potential threats.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of recent studies on uncertainty.
- Analysis of behavioral consequences, including decision-making processes.
- Integration of concepts like neophilia, neophobia, and mixed-motive games.
More Related Videos
Main Results:
- Uncertainty presents both downsides (e.g., decision-making sloth, distorted risk perception) and upsides (e.g., exploration, learning).
- Behavioral responses to uncertainty vary, encompassing risk-averse and risk-seeking tendencies.
- The interplay of novelty-seeking (neophilia) and novelty-avoiding (neophobia) influences choices under uncertainty.
Conclusions:
- Uncertainty is a critical factor in learning, exploration, and decision-making.
- Future research should focus on testable hypotheses derived from the reviewed literature.
- A nuanced understanding of uncertainty's pros and cons is essential for predicting and influencing behavior.