Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived left atrial parameters for assessing diastolic dysfunction and prognosis in
Weiwei Liao1, Jianping Zhong1, Wenjian Tang1
1Medical Imaging Center, Ganzhou Hospital-Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University (Ganzhou People's Hospital), Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China.
Insights
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) left atrial (LA) parameters effectively diagnose diastolic dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). These LA parameters also predict heart failure and atrial fibrillation, aiding risk stratification.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Echocardiography is standard for assessing left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
- Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) lacks guideline-recommended valvular hemodynamic parameters for LVDD assessment.
- This study explores the diagnostic and prognostic utility of CMR-derived left atrial (LA) parameters for guideline-defined LVDD in HCM.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic value of CMR LA parameters for guideline-defined LVDD in HCM patients.
- To assess the prognostic significance of CMR LA parameters for adverse cardiovascular events in HCM.
- To compare the efficacy of LA parameters versus traditional LV indices in diagnosing elevated left atrial pressure (LAP).
Main Methods:
- A dual-center study involving 248 HCM patients and 70 controls, all undergoing echocardiography and CMR.
- Patients were classified based on echocardiographic guidelines for normal or elevated left atrial pressure (LAP).
- CMR-derived volumetric and feature-tracking (FT) strain analyses quantified left heart function, focusing on LA parameters.
Main Results:
- HCM patients exhibited impaired LA reservoir, conduit, and booster pump strains compared to controls, worsening with LVDD progression.
- LA parameters, particularly LA reservoir strain (εs), demonstrated superior diagnostic ability for elevated LAP compared to LV indices (AUC=0.903).
- LA parameters (εs, LAVImin) and LV-LGE burden independently predicted heart failure events, while εs also predicted atrial fibrillation, outperforming the HCM-AF score.
Conclusions:
- CMR-derived LA parameters are sensitive indicators of LVDD with elevated LAP in HCM.
- These LA parameters offer significant clinical value for risk stratification and prognostic assessment in HCM patients.
- CMR LA parameters enhance the comprehensive evaluation of diastolic function and cardiovascular risk in HCM.
Background:
Echocardiography is the mainstay for assessing left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Given that routine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) lacks guideline-recommended valvular hemodynamic parameters, this study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of CMR left atrial (LA) parameters for guideline-defined LVDD.
Methods:
This dual-center study included 248 HCM patients and 70 controls, all of whom underwent both echocardiography and CMR. Patients were categorized into normal left atrial pressure (LAP) (normal or Grade I LVDD) and elevated LAP (Grade ≥ II LVDD) groups per echocardiographic guidelines. Volumetric and CMR-FT strain analyses quantified left heart function. LA parameters' diagnostic ability for elevated LAP and their prognostic value were assessed.
Results:
Compared with controls, HCM patients showed significantly impaired LA reservoir (εs), conduit (εe), and booster pump (εa) strains, which progressively deteriorated with LAP elevation (LVDD progression), while LA volumes progressively increased. LA parameters diagnosed elevated LAP superior to LV indices, with εs showing the highest efficacy [AUC=0.903, cutoff=27.95%]; combining εs with LAVImin improved the AUC to 0.929. Multivariable Cox analysis showed εs (HR: 0.867), LAVImin (HR: 1.025), and LV-LGE burden (HR: 1.103) were independent predictors of heart failure-related composite events, and the combined model demonstrated a C-index of 0.852. Furthermore, both εs and the HCM-AF score independently predicted incident atrial fibrillation, with εs outperforming the HCM-AF score (C-index: 0.802 vs 0.734).
Conclusion:
CMR LA parameters are sensitive markers for LVDD with elevated LAP in HCM, providing significant clinical value for risk stratification and prognostic assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
