Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Application of Simplified Stent-bridging Pancreaticogastrostomy in Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Published on: March 17, 2026
Long-term outcomes of plastic versus metal stents for preoperative biliary drainage in pancreatic cancer: a
Kazumasa Nagai1, Shinya Hirakawa2, Masamichi Mizuma3
1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Background And Aims:
Preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) is frequently required in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) undergoing curative intent surgery presenting with obstructive jaundice. With the increasing use of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), optimal stent selection-plastic stents (PSs) versus metal stents (MSs)-remains controversial, particularly regarding long-term outcomes. Here, using the National Clinical Database, we compared overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) between MSs and PSs in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) before pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for PDAC.
Methods:
We performed a nationwide propensity score-matched cohort study of patients with PDAC who underwent PD after PBD between 2012 and 2017. Patients who underwent ERCP were categorized into 2 groups: PS and MS. The primary endpoint was OS; secondary end points included RFS and surgical outcomes. Secondary analyses included a NAT subgroup and comparison of ERCP with percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD).
Results:
Among 6429 eligible patients, 5621 underwent ERCP (PS: n = 3225; MS: n = 451; endoscopic nasobiliary drainage: n = 1823; excluded cases: n = 122) and 808 underwent PTBD. After matching, with a median follow-up period of 63.1 months (IQR, 38.9-77.6 months), OS and RFS demonstrated no significant differences between PSs and MSs, both in the overall ERCP cohort and the NAT subgroup. Postoperative adverse events did not differ significantly between the groups. Secondary analysis showed no survival differences between ERCP and PTBD.
Conclusions:
In this nationwide real-world propensity score-matched study, no significant differences were observed between PSs and MSs in long-term oncologic and surgical outcomes after PD for PDAC, including among patients who received NAT. Stent choice should be individualized based on drainage duration and treatment strategy, rather than expectations of long-term prognosis.
