Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Counting co-occurring diseases to predict mortality is as accurate as multimorbidity indices: an external validation
Premysl Velek1,2, Marije J Splinter1, Lucy Stirland3
1Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Background:
A systematic review recommended seven multimorbidity indices for predicting mortality. However, their performance has not been assessed in a head-to-head comparison. We externally validated these indices and determined their performance compared to counting co-occurring diseases.
Setting:
Within the prospective Rotterdam Study in the Netherlands, we constructed seven specific sub-cohorts, selected from 14 926 community-dwelling older adults to match the target population of the selected multimorbidity indices.
Methods:
We calculated prediction scores according to the indices' original methods and used these as predictors in logistic regression models with all-cause mortality as outcome. We assessed their performance and compared it to four benchmark models fitted on the same index-specific samples. These models were based on (i) age and sex; (ii) counts of co-occurring diseases, age and sex; (iii) counts of co-occurring diseases associated with mortality, age and sex; and (iv) individual diseases as separate predictors, age and sex.
Results:
The total population sizes of the seven sub-cohorts ranged from 2409 to 9045 participants. The mean age of the populations ranged from 59.4 to 77.0 years; the proportion of women ranged from 56.0% to 61.8% (excluding single-sex indices). The absolute risk for mortality ranged from 0.9% to 13%. Discriminative performance of the indices and corresponding count models was nearly identical across all indices (maximum difference in C-statistic: 0.06), yet higher than age-and-sex models. Absolute accuracy of the prediction scores was similar across all models (maximum improvement in Brier score: 4%). Calibration was poor in four out of seven indices, all of which had a follow-up time of 2 years or less.
Conclusion:
Counting co-occurring diseases is as accurate in predicting all-cause mortality in the general population as using multimorbidity indices. These findings imply that counting diseases is the more practical and reliable way of providing prognosis to patients with multimorbidity in a population of community-dwelling adults.
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Classification of Illness
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe and...
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness, disability,...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
