Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2026
Cognitive Function and Upper Limb Rehabilitation Training Post-Stroke Using a Digital Occupational Training System
Published on: December 29, 2023
Group-based versus one-to-one occupational therapy to improve ADL ability in people with chronic conditions: a pilot
Cecilie von Bülow1, Signe B Bojesen2, Vita Hagelskjær3,4,5
1Occupation-centered Occupational Therapy, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. Cecilie.von.bulow@regionh.dk.
Background:
Occupational therapy interventions can improve the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL) in individuals with chronic conditions. The group-based ADAPT program was developed as an alternative to usual one-to-one occupational therapy (UOT), aiming to enhance ADL ability through structured problem-solving processes and implementation of adaptational strategies. This pilot and feasibility study evaluated the feasibility of delivering ADAPT 3.0 in a municipal setting and informed the design of a future full-scale randomised controlled trial (RCT).
Methods:
A two-armed pilot RCT was conducted in a Danish municipality, comparing outcomes of ADAPT 3.0 to UOT. Eligible clients (≥ 18 years, chronic conditions, decreased ADL ability) were randomised to either intervention or control group. Outcomes included recruitment and retention, trial participation, impact on staff, access to UOT documentation, completion of outcome measures, and fidelity to the ADAPT manual. Descriptive statistics, logbook notes, and predefined progression criteria guided the evaluation.
Results:
Twelve clients and four ADAPT-trained occupational therapists participated. ADAPT 3.0 was delivered with high fidelity and dose. Most progression criteria were met, including access to UOT documentation and successful delivery of ADAPT 3.0. However, recruitment was slower than anticipated, and clients in the UOT group reported to receive limited trial-related information. Completion rates of follow-up evaluations were acceptable in the ADAPT group but lower in the UOT group. Minor structural and procedural challenges were identified.
Conclusion:
The study supports the feasibility of delivering ADAPT 3.0 in a municipal setting and progressing to a full-scale RCT. To ensure robust trial conduct, key refinements are needed in recruitment procedures, participant information for the UOT group, and clarity of outcome measures.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05775653.
