The impact of primary percutaneous coronary intervention timing on prognosis in STEMI patients
Lihui Zhou1, Jin Si2, Ming Yi2
1Department of Geriatrics, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disease, Beijing, China; Department of Cardiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, China.
Insights
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) within 6 hours of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) symptom onset significantly reduces long-term mortality. PPCI beyond 6 hours may offer in-hospital benefits but does not provide significant long-term advantages compared to no PPCI.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Acute Coronary Syndromes
Background:
- The efficacy of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) initiated more than 6 hours after symptom onset is not well-established.
- Timely reperfusion therapy is crucial for improving outcomes in STEMI patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of PPCI performed within 6 hours versus beyond 6 hours after STEMI symptom onset.
- To compare outcomes of PPCI (both early and delayed) against no reperfusion therapy in STEMI patients.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 3720 STEMI patients from January 2009 to December 2022.
- Patients were categorized into three groups: PPCI within 6h, PPCI beyond 6h, and no PPCI.
- Clinical outcomes were assessed using Cox multivariable analyses and propensity score matching.
Main Results:
- PPCI within 6 hours was associated with significantly lower long-term mortality (HR 0.565, p < 0.001) and Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) (HR 0.765, p = 0.003) compared to no PPCI.
- PPCI beyond 6 hours showed comparable long-term mortality (HR 0.766, p = 0.068) and MACCE (HR 0.884, p = 0.234) versus no PPCI, despite potentially improved in-hospital outcomes.
- Propensity score-matched analyses confirmed these findings.
Conclusions:
- Performing PPCI within 6 hours of STEMI symptom onset is essential for achieving significant long-term survival benefits.
- While delayed PPCI might offer some in-hospital advantages, it does not translate to improved long-term outcomes compared to conservative management.
Background:
The benefit of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) performed beyond 6 h after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) symptom onset remains uncertain.
Methods:
Patients presenting with STEMI from January 2009 to December 2022 were consecutively enrolled and stratified into three groups: PPCI within 6 h, PPCI beyond 6 h, and no PPCI. Clinical outcomes were compared using Cox multivariable analyses and propensity score matching.
Results:
A total of 3,720 patients were included (77.4% male, mean age 62.61 ± 12.66 years). Patients were divided into PPCI within 6 h group (n = 1,127, 30.3%), PPCI beyond 6 h group (n = 587, 15.8%), and no PPCI group (n = 2,006, 53.9%). In-hospital mortality rates were 2.8%, 4.1% and 5.2%, respectively (p = 0.006), with pairwise analysis revealing significant differences among the groups. During a median follow-up of 4.96 years, cumulative mortality was 13.1% in PPCI within 6 h group, 16.0% in PPCI beyond 6 h group, and 24.0% in no PPCI group (P < 0.001). PPCI within 6 h was associated with lower mortality (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.565 (0.429-0.744), p < 0.001) or MACCE (adjusted HR 0.765 (0.640-0.914), p = 0.003) while PPCI beyond 6 h showed comparable cumulative mortality (adjusted HR 0.766 (0.575-1.020), p = 0.068) and MACCE (adjusted HR 0.884 (0.721-1.083), p = 0.234) versus no PPCI. Concordant results were observed in propensity score-matched cohorts.
Conclusion:
While PPCI beyond 6 h of symptom onset may improve in-hospital outcomes in STEMI patients, it is necessary to perform PPCI within 6 h to achieve significant long-term benefits.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations

