Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
Published on: March 19, 2014
Modifying the Meaning of the Upper Anchor Predictably Shapes Ratings of Perceived Effort: A Randomized Crossover
Dennis Okhamafe1,2, Yedidya Silverman1,2, Andrew D Vigotsky3,4,5
1Department of Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Gray Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Background:
Ratings of perceived effort (RPE) are used to prescribe and monitor training. Yet, the influence of how the upper anchor ("10") is defined remains underexplored, despite holding theoretical and practical value. Here, we examined whether modifying the upper anchor predictably modifies RPEs during isometric exercises.
Methods:
We conducted a within-subject, randomized crossover study in 26 resistance-trained adults. Participants performed isometric contractions at 20-100% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) in three exercises: unilateral plantar flexion, unilateral knee extension, and the isometric mid-thigh pull. After each contraction, participants reported RPE (0-10) relative to one session-specific anchor: same-task (maximal effort in the task performed), different-task (maximal effort in the isometric mid-thigh pull), or self-selected (the most effortful task ever experienced or imagined). We estimated expected RPEs and slopes relating RPE to %MVC for each exercise-anchor combination. Preregistered comparisons assessed anchor effects, muscle-mass dose-response, and approximate scale invariance across anchors.
Results:
Anchor type substantially influenced RPE. Same-task anchors consistently produced the highest RPEs, self-selected the lowest, and different-task anchors intermediate values, with effects most pronounced at 80-100% MVC. The ratings increased with %MVC across all conditions. Under the self-selected anchors, exercises engaging greater muscle mass tended to yield higher RPEs. The relative differences between exercises were largely preserved across anchors, indicating that anchor choice alters RPE while maintaining approximate scale invariance.
Conclusions:
Upper anchors predictably shape RPE across tasks and intensities. Researchers and applied practitioners using RPE in resistance training should explicitly define, justify, and consistently report anchoring procedures, and align anchor choice with the intended purpose to support valid interpretation and comparisons.
More Related Videos
13:20Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
Published on: December 5, 2025
08:05A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
Published on: January 5, 2018
Related Concept Videos
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Framing Effects
Group Design
Regression Toward the Mean
Cognitive Dissonance