Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

An Appetitive Spatial Working Memory Task for Mice in a Semi-Automated 8-Arm Radial Maze, Reducing Fearful Memory Association in the Maze
Published on: July 29, 2025
Gene × sex interactions on cognition in the Philadelphia neurodevelopmental cohort
Josephine Mollon1, Emma E M Knowles2, Samuel R Mathias2
1Department of Psychiatry, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. josephine.mollon@childrens.harvard.edu.
Background:
Small differences between females and males in cognitive abilities have been consistently reported, but the factors underlying these sex differences remain unclear. Social and cultural factors are thought to play a key role, but studies on this topic have been inconclusive. Examination of genetic factors may shed some light on the mechanisms underlying cognitive sex differences.
Methods:
Using data from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort, a large, general population sample of individuals aged 8 to 21 years old (N = 4,694), we tested for sex differences in the genetic factors (i.e., Gene × Sex interactions) underlying cognitive ability. Participants completed the Penn Computerized Neurocognitive Battery, which consists of 14 tests designed to capture accuracy and speed in five domains: 1) executive function (abstraction and mental flexibility, attention, working memory), 2) episodic memory (verbal, facial, spatial), 3) complex cognition (verbal reasoning, nonverbal reasoning, spatial processing), 4) social cognition (emotion identification, emotion differentiation, age differentiation), and 5) speed (motor, sensorimotor). Composite domain scores were derived using confirmatory factor analysis, and general accuracy (g) and speed (gs) using principal component analysis.
Results:
Small sex differences were observed on most cognitive measures (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.061-0.182). Males showed significantly higher genetic variance and lower environmental variance in executive (female σ2g = 0.301 v. male σ2g = 0.598, p = 0.001, female σ2e = 0.243 v. male σ2e = 0.024, p = 0.007), and complex (female σ2g = 0.291 v. male σ2g = 0.610, p = 0.001, female σ2e = 0.259 v. male σ2e = 0.023, p = 0.006) accuracy. Females showed significantly higher genetic and lower environmental variance on complex (female σ2g = 0.575 v. male σ2g = 0.135, p = 0.009, female σ2e = 0.222 v. male σ2e = 0.641, p = 0.012) and social (female σ2g = 0.589 v. male σ2g = 0.129, p = 0.009, female σ2e = 0.236 v. male σ2e = 0.672, p = 0.012) speed. Genetic correlations between females and males were not significantly different from 1 on any cognitive measure. Altogether, our results suggest that while the same genetic factors influence cognition in females and males, the magnitude of effect of these genetic factors differs.
Conclusions:
We observed small differences between females and males on most cognitive measures, as well as sex differences in heritability on some measures. Future studies are needed to delineate how environmental, genetic, and other biological factors jointly influence cognition.
Related Concept Videos
Sex Linked Disorders
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
Sex-linked Disorders
Gene-Environment Interactions
Human Genetics
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...

