Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field
Published on: May 26, 2020
Doping Prevalence in Sport from Indirect Estimation Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Dominic Sagoe1,2, Maarten Cruyff3, Razieh Chegeni4,5
1Department of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Christiesgate 12, 5015, Bergen, Norway. dominic.sagoe@uib.no.
Background:
To our knowledge, no previous systematic review and meta-analysis of doping prevalence in sport from indirect estimation models (IEM) exists.
Objective:
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of empirical IEM-based studies of admitted doping prevalence in sport.
Methods:
We conducted electronic database and ad hoc searches up to March 2025, and estimated lifetime and past year prevalence rates through a cross-classified model including prevalence (lifetime vs. past year), sample (competitive vs. recreational) and sports (multi-sport vs. single-sport) types.
Results:
Forty-six records (K) were included in the review (k [subset records included in the meta-analysis] = 30, n [independent studies from the records] = 34). The World Anti-Doping Agency's definition of doping use was applied for data collection in most studies (k = 18), and doping prevalence was mostly assessed as past year/season (k = 20). Studies included in the meta-analysis were mostly conducted in Europe (k = 22) and applied the Unrelated Question (k = 8) and Forced Response with Cheater Detection (k = 6) models. Study participants were mostly multi-sport (k = 20) and competed at diverse levels, and most data (k = 28) was collected outside sport events. The corpus included articles that re-analysed existing data (k = 4). Lifetime prevalence was highest for multi-sport competitive athletes (22.6%) and lowest for single-sport competitive athletes (12.7%), whereas past year prevalence was highest for single-sport recreational sportspersons (15.5%) and lowest for multi-sport recreational sportspersons (8.7%).
Conclusions:
Under IEM, about one of five multi-sport competitive athletes admitted to ever doping whereas about one of six of single-sport recreational sportspersons admitted to doping in the past year. Furthermore, multi-sport (vs. single-sport) competitive athletes show relatively higher doping prevalences, whereas single-sport (vs. multi-sport) recreational sportspersons report relatively higher doping prevalences. Secondary (re-)analysis presents a novel methodological challenge for meta-analyses. Registration PROSPERO: CRD42022373691.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model
Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model
Protein-Drug Binding: Determination Methods
Indirect methods involve isolating the bound drug from its free form in biological samples such as blood, serum, or plasma. These techniques aim to measure the percentage of drugs bound to proteins. Equilibrium dialysis is a commonly used method where the free drug concentration at equilibrium is measured by separating the bound...
Analysis Methods of Pharmacokinetic Data: Model and Model-Independent Approaches
The model approach uses mathematical models to describe changes in drug concentration over time. Pharmacokinetic models help characterize drug behavior in patients, predict drug concentration in the body fluids, calculate optimum dosage regimens, and evaluate the risk of toxicity. However, ensuring that the model fits the experimental data accurately...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions