Modified HEART score to improve ruling out acute coronary syndrome at the emergency department
Eleonora Tubertini1, Mario Luca Morieri2, Gabriele Farina3
1Emergency Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via P. Albertoni 15, 40138, Bologna, Italy. eleonora.tubertini@aosp.bo.it.
Insights
The modified HEART (mHEART) score best identifies patients with chest pain in the emergency department who can be safely discharged. This score, when combined with high-sensitivity troponin testing, improves patient management and reduces major cardiovascular events.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Cardiology
- Clinical Risk Stratification
Background:
- Risk scores like the HEART score aid in safely discharging emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain.
- A modified and simplified HEART score (mHEART) has been developed to enhance this process.
Purpose of the Study:
- To prospectively validate the mHEART score's performance.
- To compare the mHEART score against the classic HEART and GRACE scores for chest pain evaluation.
Main Methods:
- A prospective observational study enrolled adult patients with non-traumatic chest pain in the ED.
- GRACE, classic HEART, and mHEART scores were calculated for all patients.
- The primary outcome was major cardiovascular events and overall mortality within 90 days (MACE).
Main Results:
- The mHEART score demonstrated superior performance with a higher Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.891 compared to classic HEART (0.884) and GRACE (0.804).
- mHEART identified 51% of patients at low risk with a 1.0% MACE incidence, similar to the classic HEART score (48% low risk, 1.0% MACE).
- Combining mHEART with high-sensitivity troponin testing allowed safe discharge for nearly 50% of patients with a 0.5% MACE miss-rate.
Conclusions:
- The mHEART score exhibits the best performance for ruling out acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in ED chest pain patients.
- Integrating the mHEART score into current high-sensitivity troponin algorithms can optimize the management of chest pain presentations.
Background:
Beyond high-sensitivity troponin (hs-Tn) testing, risk scores are recommended (e.g. HEART score) to identify patients which could be safely discharged from ED. A modified and simplified version of HEART score (mHEART score) has been developed for the same goal.
Objective:
We aimed to prospectively validate the mHEART score and compared its performance with that of two other commonly used scores, GRACE and classic HEART scores.
Methods:
Prospective observational study carried out from November 2019 to November 2020. Consecutive adult patients admitted to the ED of University Hospital of Bologna for non-traumatic chest pain were enrolled. For each enrolled patient GRACE, classic HEART and mHEART scores were calculated. The main outcome was the occurrence of major cardiovascular events and overall mortality over 90 days (MACE).
Results:
The mHEART score had higher AUC (0.891) as compared to classic HEART (0.884) and GRACE (AUC 0.804) scores (p < 0.001). The classic HEART score identified 48% patients at low risk, mHEART score 51% and GRACE 63%. The cumulative MACE incidence in these groups were 1.0%, 1.0% and 6.1%, respectively. The modified and classic HEART scores showed the highest negative predictive value (99%). If combined with multiple hs-Tn testing, when appropriated according to the guidelines, the mHEART allowed to identify half of the population (49.8%) that could have been discharged with a MACE miss-rate of 0.5%.
Conclusions:
mHEART score showed the best performance for ruling out ACS among patients with chest-pain presenting in the ED. Integration of this score with current hs-Tn algorithm might enhance management of patients with chest-pain in ED.
More Related Videos
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
08:19Transthoracic Echocardiography to Assess Post-Resuscitation Left Ventricular Dysfunction After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest in Pigs
Published on: July 12, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Introduction Cardiac Emergencies
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
