Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS): Interferences01:20

Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS): Interferences

Inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP–MS) is a highly selective and sensitive technique for accurate elemental analysis. Though the analysis of ICP–MS mass spectra is comparatively straightforward, it is affected by spectroscopic and non-spectroscopic interferences. Spectroscopic interferences arise when the plasma contains ionic species with an m/z value the same as the analyte ion. Spectroscopic interference can be categorized as isobaric, polyatomic ions, and refractory oxide ion...
Interference: Path Lengths01:10

Interference: Path Lengths

Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Brainwaves under medication: revealing class-specific neural signatures of psychotropic medication from 24,000 EEGs.

EBioMedicine·2026
Same author

Cognitive and brain function enhancement in Gen X group after personalized, AI supervised EEG-neurofeedback training.

Journal of neural engineering·2026
Same author

Diffuse scattering in silver hypodiphosphate, Ag<sub>4</sub>(P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>6</sub>), probed by 3D ED.

Acta crystallographica. Section C, Structural chemistry·2026
Same author

Clinical competence of Polish paramedics in caring for LGBT patients: A national cross-sectional study.

Advances in clinical and experimental medicine : official organ Wroclaw Medical University·2026
Same author

The exposome of brain aging across 34 countries.

Nature medicine·2026
Same author

Semantic Agency Patterns Signal Depressive Experiences: Evidence From Postpartum Communication on Social Media.

Depression and anxiety·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Electromagnetic Source Imaging in Presurgical Evaluation of Children with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy
09:57

Electromagnetic Source Imaging in Presurgical Evaluation of Children with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

Published on: September 20, 2024

Common but different: An ERP study of single- and multi-source interference processing in MSIT.

Katarzyna Paluch1, Ingrida Antonova2, Jan Nikadon3

  • 1Laboratory of Neurophysiology of Mind, Center of Excellence for Neural Plasticity and Brain Disorders: BRAINCITY, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw 02-093, Poland.

Neuroimage
|June 7, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cognitive control uses common brain processing stages for different conflict types, with intensity scaling by task difficulty. Flanker conflict uniquely impacts early stages, while later stages integrate multiple conflicts.

Keywords:
Cognitive controlEriksen flanker taskMicrostatesMulti-source interferenceSimon taskSource localization

More Related Videos

Conventional and Threshold-Tracking Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Tests for Single-handed Operation
08:24

Conventional and Threshold-Tracking Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Tests for Single-handed Operation

Published on: August 16, 2021

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Electromagnetic Source Imaging in Presurgical Evaluation of Children with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy
09:57

Electromagnetic Source Imaging in Presurgical Evaluation of Children with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

Published on: September 20, 2024

Conventional and Threshold-Tracking Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Tests for Single-handed Operation
08:24

Conventional and Threshold-Tracking Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Tests for Single-handed Operation

Published on: August 16, 2021

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Flexible behavior necessitates processing complex, interfering information.
  • Previous research on cognitive control and conflict resolution often used single tasks, limiting direct comparison of interference types.
  • The existence of common versus task-specific mechanisms for conflict resolution remains an open question.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the spatio-temporal dynamics of cognitive control across various conflict types using event-related potentials (ERPs).
  • To determine if different conflict types are resolved by a common neural mechanism or distinct, task-specific pathways.
  • To examine the interaction between different conflict types within a single processing framework.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized event-related potentials (ERPs) to analyze cognitive control dynamics.
  • Compared Simon, flanker, multi-source, and no-conflict conditions.
  • Employed source analysis to localize ERP components and relate findings to neuroimaging studies.

Main Results:

  • All conflict conditions engaged a common sequence of processing stages, evidenced by consistent ERP waveforms and microstates.
  • The intensity and duration of these common stages scaled with conflict task difficulty (reaction times, accuracy).
  • Flanker conflict uniquely affected early ERP components (dorsal attention, visual areas), while later components integrated multiple conflicts (ventral attention, somatomotor areas).

Conclusions:

  • Cognitive control across different conflict types shares common underlying neural processing stages.
  • Conflict resolution involves both common and unique neural dynamics, with stage intensity and duration modulated by task difficulty.
  • The findings offer novel insights into the neural dynamics of cognitive control and conflict interaction, supported by source analysis grounding ERP data.