SNAC-DB: An ML-ready database for antibody and NANOBODY® VHH-antigen complexes with expanded structural diversity and...

Predicting antibody and NANOBODY® VHH-antigen complexes remains a critical challenge for state-of-the-art structure prediction models, limiting their impact in therapeutic discovery pipelines. We introduce SNAC-DB, an ML-ready database and curation pipeline enriched with structural biology expertise, designed to accelerate model accuracy and generalization by providing 31-37% expanded structural diversity over existing resources like SAbDab through comprehensive re-curation that extracts maximum value from available experimental structures. SNAC-DB expands coverage by capturing often-overlooked complexes and accurately identifying complete multi-chain epitopes through improved biological-assembly based logic. Built for ML practitioners, SNAC-DB provides standardized formats with multi-threshold structure-based clustering to enable principled sample weighting during training. Using a rigorous benchmark of public PDB entries deposited post-May 2024 plus confidential therapeutic structures, we evaluate seven leading models (Protenix-v1, OpenFold-3p2, RosettaFold-3, Boltz-2, Boltz-1x, Chai-1, and AlphaFold2.3-multimer) with evaluation methodology tailored to antibody/NANOBODY® VHH-antigen complexes to ensure correct handling of multi-chain epitopes, revealing systematic performance gaps: success rates rarely exceed 25%, confidence-based ranking fails to identify best predictions even when accurate structures exist in ensembles, and all models consistently struggle with therapeutically relevant NANOBODY® VHHs. Systematic evaluation of sampling strategies demonstrates that while generating 1000 samples per target substantially increases the likelihood of producing accurate structures (oracle selection improves from 11.9% to 50.5%), confidence-based ranking remains nearly flat (between 10.9% and 14.9%), revealing that improved ranking mechanisms represent a more tractable path to performance gains. Finally, fine-tuning GeoDock on SNAC-DB yields higher success rates than training on SAbDab (11.0% vs. 7.1% for antibodies; 7.0% vs. 4.0% for NANOBODY® VHHs), suggesting that SNAC-DB's expanded structural diversity translates to improved model generalization.