Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

A Novel Rescue Technique for Difficult Intubation and Difficult Ventilation
Published on: January 17, 2011
Predicting the Appropriate Size of Endotracheal Tube Using Middle Finger Length versus Traditional Formulae in
Padmanabha Kaimar1, Kanakaveeti Gireeswar Reddy2, M Kavya Prabhu1
1Department of Anaesthesiology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Insights
Age-based formulas (ABFs) are more accurate for predicting pediatric endotracheal tube (ET) size. However, the middle finger length (MFL) formula is a better predictor in children under five years old.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Anesthesiology
- Medical Device Sizing
- Clinical Prediction Models
Background:
- Accurate sizing of cuffed endotracheal tubes (ETTs) is critical in pediatric anesthesia.
- Existing formulas for predicting pediatric ETT internal diameter (ID) vary in accuracy.
- A novel formula using middle finger length (MFL) has been proposed for ETT sizing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of the MFL formula for predicting pediatric cuffed ETT ID.
- To compare the MFL formula's performance against commonly used pediatric ETT sizing formulas.
- To identify the most reliable formula for ETT selection in pediatric patients.
Main Methods:
- A comparative observational study involving 120 pediatric patients (up to 12 years) undergoing surgery.
- Collection of patient data including age, height, weight, and MFL prior to surgery.
- Comparison of actual ETT ID with sizes predicted by MFL, age-based (ABFs), height-based (HBF), weight-based (WBF), and Multivariate prediction tool (MPT) formulas.
Main Results:
- Age-based formulas (ABFs) showed higher accuracy in exact ETT ID prediction (18.3%) compared to MFL (20%) and others.
- When considering a 0.5 mm difference, ABFs achieved 57.5% accuracy, significantly outperforming MFL (20.8%) and other methods.
- The MFL formula was a better predictor in children under five years, while ABFs were superior for the overall pediatric cohort.
Conclusions:
- Age-based formulas demonstrate superior accuracy for predicting pediatric endotracheal tube size overall.
- The middle finger length formula shows promise as a more accurate predictor in very young children (under 5 years).
- Further research may refine ETT sizing strategies based on patient age and anthropometric measurements.
Background And Aim:
Different formulas are being used to determine the internal diameter (ID) of the cuffed endotracheal (ET) tube in pediatric patients. Recently, a new formula was proposed to predict the ET tube size based on middle finger length (MFL). The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of this new formula in predicting the cuffed ET tube and to compare it with other commonly used formulas.
Materials And Methods:
This comparative observational study was carried out among 120 samples of children up to 12 years of age undergoing surgery under general anesthesia after taking their consent. All the details regarding the patient's age, height, weight, and MFL were collected a day before surgery and the ET tube details and the predicted ET tube size by the five formulae were collected on the day of surgery. They were entered into Microsoft Excel sheet and analyzed using STATA software version 17.
Results:
Out of 120 study participants, the fraction of patients in whom the exact ID of cuffed ET tube was correctly predicted with the MFL, age-based formulas (ABFs), height-based formula (HBF), weight-based formula (WBF), and Multivariate prediction tool (MPT) formula were 20%, 18.3%, 0%, 3.3%, and 0.8%, respectively. The predicted ID size within 0.5 mm difference excluding the exact fit for MFL formula, ABF, HBF, WBF, and MPT formula was 20.8%, 57.5%, 12.5%, 30.8%, and 22.5%, respectively. The predicted ID size potentially too big >0.5 mm difference for MFL formula, ABF, HBF, WBF, and MPT formulas were 59.2%, 24.2%, 87.5%, 65.8%, and 76.7%, respectively. Pearson correlation coefficient for all the formulas was r > 0.80 and shows a strong positive correlation which was statistically significant (P < 0.001).
Conclusion:
ABFs were more accurate compared to other formulae in predicting the ET tube size in case of pediatric patients, but in children less than 5 years of age, MFL formula was a better predictor than other formulas.
Related Concept Videos
Endotracheal Intubation I: Procedure
The ET tube comprises various components, including a standard adaptor to attach a bag-valve-mask (BVM) or ventilator, a cuff, a pilot balloon, and radiopaque markings along its length to measure the insertion distance. The tube sizes...
Endotracheal Tube Extubation
Procedure
Extubation removes the endotracheal tube (ETT) from the patient on mechanical ventilation. It requires a well-coordinated, multidisciplinary approach involving physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, and other healthcare professionals.
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
