Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

American Brachytherapy Society Working Group Report on cancer surveillance, sexual health, and pelvic toxicity management in gynecologic malignancies.

Brachytherapy·2026
Same author

Comparing Organs at Risk Sparing Between Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Pencil-Beam Scanning Plans Based on Disease Location for Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

International journal of particle therapy·2026
Same author

Improving complex brachytherapy efficiency: Multidisciplinary quality assurance and workflow optimization.

Brachytherapy·2026
Same author

Cervical Cancer, Version 2.2026, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines In Oncology.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN·2026
Same author

Executive Summary of the American Radium Society (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for Management of Locally Advanced Endometrial Cancer.

Practical radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Automated Treatment Plan Integrity Verification for Proton Therapy: Enhancing Error Detection and Workflow Efficiency.

International journal of particle therapy·2025
Same journal

Correction to "On the shape of the radiation survival curve in tumor spheroids: The role of oxygen heterogeneity".

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Multi-view constrained semi-supervised vertebra detection for 3D ultrasound spine volume.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Accuracy of quantitative <sup>177</sup>Lu SPECT/CT imaging: A systematic review.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Physics-constrained dual-domain network for CBCT reconstruction from orthogonal X-rays in gynecologic radiotherapy.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Decomposition-based harmonization for quantitative PET imaging across scanners and radiotracers.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Development and evaluation of an in vivo dose-based monitoring system for electron FLASH radiation therapy.

Medical physics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
08:34

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Published on: February 6, 2019

A constraint-normalized robustness index for HDR brachytherapy.

Andres Portocarrero-Bonifaz1, Emma Viviers1, Luke Mclemore1

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.

Medical Physics
|June 8, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new robustness index quantifies sensitivity to geometric uncertainties in high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). This metric provides a standardized way to evaluate HDR-BT plans, improving patient safety and treatment efficacy.

Keywords:
HDR brachytherapydose‐volume metricsplan evaluationrobustnessuncertainty analysis

More Related Videos

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

Voluntary Breath-hold Technique for Reducing Heart Dose in Left Breast Radiotherapy
11:38

Voluntary Breath-hold Technique for Reducing Heart Dose in Left Breast Radiotherapy

Published on: July 3, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
08:34

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Published on: February 6, 2019

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

Voluntary Breath-hold Technique for Reducing Heart Dose in Left Breast Radiotherapy
11:38

Voluntary Breath-hold Technique for Reducing Heart Dose in Left Breast Radiotherapy

Published on: July 3, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Brachytherapy

Background:

  • Geometric uncertainties in high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) lead to patient-specific dose deviations.
  • Current HDR-BT lacks standardized metrics for quantifying plan sensitivity to geometric perturbations, unlike external beam radiotherapy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define a dimensionless robustness index for evaluating HDR-BT plans per fraction.
  • The index is normalized to dose-limit constraints and incorporates dose-dependent penalties.
  • It offers both a full-scenario severity measure and a dose-threshold-filtered variant.

Main Methods:

  • Geometric perturbations (translations, rotations, deflections) were applied to source dwell positions.
  • A convex-transformed, constraint-normalized penalty was used for organs at risk.
  • A prescription-normalized penalty assessed target volume coverage and dose escalation.

Main Results:

  • The framework yields interpretable, structure-independent indices.
  • A Robustness Index of ≈0.90 signifies that scenarios consume only 10% of the normalized margin to dose limits.
  • A threshold-filtered variant assesses robustness for scenarios exceeding clinical dose levels.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed index offers a standardized, clinically anchored metric for HDR-BT plan evaluation under geometric uncertainty.
  • It complements existing dose-volume histogram reporting with a single, interpretable number.
  • This enhances the assessment of HDR-BT plans for improved patient outcomes.