Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Preparation of Cytoplasmic and Nuclear Long RNAs from Primary and Cultured Cells
Published on: April 7, 2023
Single-Agent Selinexor Versus Physician's Choice in Previously Treated Myelofibrosis: Results From the Phase 2
Sebastian Grosicki1, Habte Yimer2, Rosa Ayala3
1Department of Cancer Prevention Medical University of Silesia Katowice Poland.
Background:
Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis), the current standard of care for myelofibrosis (MF), provide clinical benefit, but responses are frequently incomplete, non-durable, and associated with cytopenias, underscoring the need for therapies with novel mechanisms of action. Selinexor, an oral selective inhibitor of Exportin 1 (XPO1), modulates nuclear-cytoplasmic transport, inflammatory signaling, and cancer cell proliferation.
Methods:
XPORT-MF-035, a global, Phase 2, randomized, open-label study comparing selinexor monotherapy with physician's choice (PC) in MF previously treated with JAKi, randomized patients 1:1 to selinexor or PC, with crossover permitted upon disease progression or inadequate spleen response. Primary endpoint was spleen volume reduction ≥ 35% (SVR35). Additional endpoints included symptom improvement, hematologic outcomes, plasma cytokine analyses, and safety.
Results:
Twenty-four patients were enrolled and treated. In the efficacy-evaluable population, SVR35 at any time was achieved by 29% (2/7) and 13% (1/8) of selinexor- and PC-treated patients, respectively; 8% (1/12) in each arm achieved SVR35 at Week 24 in the intent-to-treat population. Among evaluable patients, 40% (2/5) achieved SVR35 following selinexor crossover. Symptom improvement was observed with selinexor but not PC. Selinexor-treated patients experienced fewer Grade ≥ 3 anemia events with lower transfusion burden and reductions in multiple proinflammatory cytokines. Selinexor was generally well tolerated; common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included anemia, asthenia, and decreased weight. One TEAE leading to death occurred in the selinexor and two in PC; none were considered treatment-related.
Conclusions:
Despite limited sample size, XPORT-MF-035 provides descriptive data on the safety, tolerability, and biological activity of selinexor monotherapy in previously treated MF, supporting further evaluation in this population.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04562870.
Insights
Selinexor shows promise in myelofibrosis patients previously treated with JAK inhibitors, demonstrating symptom improvement and favorable safety profiles. Further research is warranted for this novel therapy.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Hematology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) are standard for myelofibrosis (MF) but have limitations.
- Novel therapies are needed due to incomplete and non-durable responses to JAKis.
- Selinexor, an oral Exportin 1 (XPO1) inhibitor, offers a new mechanism of action.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate selinexor monotherapy versus physician's choice (PC) in MF patients previously treated with JAKi.
- To assess spleen volume reduction (SVR35) and symptom improvement.
- To analyze hematologic outcomes, cytokine profiles, and safety.
Main Methods:
- Phase 2, randomized, open-label study (XPORT-MF-035) comparing selinexor and PC.
- 1:1 randomization with crossover permitted.
- Primary endpoint: SVR35; secondary endpoints: symptoms, hematologic data, cytokines, safety.
Main Results:
- SVR35 at any time was achieved by 29% of selinexor-treated and 13% of PC-treated patients (evaluable population).
- Selinexor demonstrated symptom improvement, unlike PC.
- Selinexor showed fewer Grade ≥3 anemia events and reduced pro-inflammatory cytokines, with generally good tolerability.
Conclusions:
- Selinexor monotherapy shows potential in previously treated MF patients.
- The study provides descriptive data on selinexor's safety, tolerability, and biological activity.
- Further investigation of selinexor in this patient population is supported.
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
