Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

An In Vitro Model of a Parallel-Plate Perfusion System to Study Bacterial Adherence to Graft Tissues
Published on: January 7, 2019
Mortality and prognostic factors in infective endocarditis: A Colombian multicenter cohort
Juan David Zuluaga Monroy1, Maria Alejandra Perez Ardila2, Henry Augusto Millan Prada2
1Department of Cardiology, Fundación Abood Shaio, Bogotá, Colombia.
Insights
Infective endocarditis (IE) in Colombia has a high in-hospital mortality rate of 32.7%. Renal replacement therapy and perivalvular abscess are key predictors of death, while surgery offers protection.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Public Health
Background:
- Infective endocarditis (IE) poses a significant global health challenge.
- Understanding mortality predictors in diverse populations is crucial for targeted interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate in-hospital mortality in a Colombian IE cohort.
- To identify independent prognostic factors for mortality in this population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 308 patients with definitive IE across four Colombian hospitals (2007-2017).
- Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent mortality predictors.
- Primary outcome was in-hospital death.
Main Results:
- In-hospital mortality was 32.7%, with significant variation between centers.
- Independent predictors of death included renal replacement therapy, perivalvular abscess, CNS embolism, older age, and Staphylococcus aureus etiology.
- Cardiac surgery was independently protective.
Conclusions:
- Renal replacement therapy and perivalvular abscess are strong predictors of mortality in Colombian IE patients.
- Cardiac surgery is protective but often not performed due to high-risk profiles.
- Findings highlight the need for early risk identification and multidisciplinary evaluation in tertiary care settings.
Objectives:
This study aimed to estimate in-hospital mortality and identify prognostic factors in infective endocarditis (IE) in a Colombian multicenter cohort.
Methods:
This was a retrospective cohort study of 308 consecutive patients with definitive IE (modified Duke criteria) across four Colombian hospitals (2007-2017). Multivariate logistic regression identified independent mortality predictors. The primary outcome was in-hospital death.
Results:
In-hospital mortality was 32.7% (101 of 308), with substantial across-center heterogeneity (9.6-45.9%), contrasting with European (EURO-ENDO 17.1%) and Latin American (25.1%) registries. Independent predictors of death in multivariable logistic regression were renal replacement therapy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 9.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.61-18.34), perivalvular abscess (aOR 6.42, 95% CI 2.69-15.35), central nervous system embolism (aOR 3.07, 95% CI 1.63-5.80), older age (aOR 1.03 per year, 95% CI 1.01-1.05), and Staphylococcus aureus etiology (aOR 1.87, 95% CI 0.99-3.51). Surgery was independently protective (aOR 0.34, 95% CI 0.18-0.63), an estimate that persisted after propensity score adjustment. Of 199 patients with surgical indication, 78.9% underwent surgery; non-operated cases had prohibitive risk profiles. Model discrimination was good (area under receiver operating characteristic curve 0.842, 95% CI 0.791-0.894).
Conclusion:
Renal replacement therapy and perivalvular abscess are the strongest independent predictors of in-hospital mortality in this Colombian multicenter IE cohort, whereas cardiac surgery is protective but frequently precluded by prohibitive risk profiles. The 32.7% mortality reflects the high-severity spectrum of a tertiary referral population and is not generalizable to lower-complexity settings. Early identification of patients at risk for dialysis-requiring acute kidney injury and timely multidisciplinary surgical evaluation represent priority clinical intervention targets. In this Colombian multicenter cohort, in-hospital mortality was 32.7%, with substantial across-center heterogeneity. Renal replacement therapy and perivalvular abscess emerged as the strongest independent mortality predictors, identifying patients with limited physiological reserve and advanced infection. Surgery was strongly and consistently protective, including after propensity score adjustment, although unmeasured confounding by indication cannot be fully excluded. Whether multidisciplinary endocarditis team implementation can translate this prognostic information into mortality reduction in Colombian tertiary settings is a hypothesis that should be tested prospectively.
Related Concept Videos
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Endocarditis I: Introduction
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin create...
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care