Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation
Published on: September 8, 2023
The ASME-speller: 30-class auditory brain-computer interface speller using stream segregation and the QWERTY layout
Simon Kojima1, Shin'ichiro Kanoh1,2
1Graduate School of Engineering and Science, Shibaura Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
Introduction:
This study presents the ASME-speller, a novel 30-class auditory brain-computer interface (BCI) speller system that combines auditory stream segregation with the familiar QWERTY keyboard layout to facilitate intuitive and visionfree communication.
Methods:
In the ASME-speller, three distinct auditory streams are presented simultaneously, each corresponding to a row on the QWERTY keyboard. The low-, middle-, and high-frequency streams represent the bottom, middle, and top rows, respectively. Within each stream, alphabet letters and selected symbols are repeatedly presented as spoken voice stimuli. Users are instructed to focus exclusively on the stream corresponding to the row containing the target letter and to selectively attend to that letter within the stream. By leveraging the QWERTY layout and auditory stream segregation, the proposed approach enables users to restrict their attentional focus to a subset of letters by directing selective attention to auditory streams, while the mapping between QWERTY rows and stream pitch facilitates intuitive letter selection. We conducted online experiments with ten healthy participants to evaluate system performance.
Results:
The ASME-speller achieved an average classification accuracy of 0.76 and an average information transfer rate (ITR) of 2.16 bits/min. Excluding one participant whose EEG data contained excessive artifacts, these values improved to 0.84 and 2.40 bits/min, respectively. Post-hoc analyses further examined the effects of preprocessing parameters, classification pipelines, and early stopping strategies. Among four pipelines tested, a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) combined with dynamic stopping demonstrated the most robust performance across participants (accuracy of 0.80 and ITR of 4.76 bits/min). For the best participant, a deep learning model (EEGNet4,2) with dynamic stopping achieved accuracy of 1.0 with ITR of 14.44 bits/min.
Discussion:
Compared to previous auditory BCI spellers, the ASME-speller demonstrates performance comparable to existing systems, while offering advantages in terms of simplicity, requiring only standard headphones and no visual support. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of the ASME-speller and pave the way toward practical auditory BCI applications for communication.

