Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

06:07
Direct Bioprinting of 3D Multicellular Breast Spheroids onto Endothelial Networks
Published on: November 2, 2020
From 2D to 3D Bioprinted In Vitro Breast Cancer Model: A Comparative Study of Proliferation, Tissue Structure, and
Dorottya Moldvai1, Gábor Petővári1, Rebeka Gelencsér1
1Department of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary.
Medcomm
|June 8, 2026
Summary
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting creates realistic breast cancer models. These 3D models better mimic tumors than 2D cultures, offering improved preclinical drug testing and research accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Cancer Research
- Tissue Engineering
Background:
- Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is a promising alternative to animal testing for preclinical cancer models.
- Standardized and comparable 3D bioprinted models are needed for reliable research.
- This study focuses on characterizing a 3D bioprinted breast carcinoma model using the T47D cell line.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize the growth dynamics, tissue architecture, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway activity of a 3D bioprinted breast carcinoma model.
- To compare these features with conventional two-dimensional (2D) monolayer cultures.
- To assess the responsiveness of the 3D model to mTOR inhibitors and chemotherapeutic agents.
Main Methods:
- Generated tissue-mimetic structures (TMSs) using 3D bioprinting with T47D cells.
- Analyzed cell viability, proliferation, autophagy, apoptosis, and expression of adhesion proteins in 3D TMSs and 2D cultures.
- Assessed mTOR pathway activity and drug response (rapamycin, ipatasertib, cisplatin) in both 3D and 2D models.
Main Results:
- 3D bioprinted TMSs remained viable for up to 3 weeks, developing a tissue-like architecture with heterogeneous marker expression and complex cellular organization.
- Compared to 2D cultures, 3D TMSs showed reduced mTOR signaling activity.
- 3D TMSs exhibited significantly decreased sensitivity to mTOR inhibition compared to 2D cultures.
Conclusions:
- 3D bioprinted breast cancer models more accurately recapitulate in situ tumor features than 2D systems.
- These advanced 3D models hold significant potential for preclinical drug testing and mechanistic studies in breast cancer.
- The characterized 3D bioprinted model provides a valuable platform for reproducible cancer research.

