Application of bedside real-time ultrasound-guided umbilical venous catheterization in neonates and development of an XGBoost-based complication prediction model: a retrospective study
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

A Modified Sonographic Algorithm for Image Acquisition in Life-Threatening Emergencies in the Critically Ill Newborn
Published on: April 7, 2023
Qiu-Ping Huang1, Mei-Xiang Zou1, Miao-Chan Zhu2
1Department of Neonatology, Panyu Maternal and Child Care Service Centre of Guangzhou, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Purpose:
To assess the application value of bedside real-time ultrasound (US) for umbilical venous catheterization (UVC) in neonates and evaluate its safety and predictive factors for complications.
Study Design And Methods:
This was a single-arm, retrospective, observational study conducted at a single institution, without a direct internal control group (such as X-ray guided placement) for comparison. A total of 132 neonates who received UVCs using real-time US guidance with color Doppler were included. Clinical variables, including success rates and complications within 2 weeks post-insertion, were captured. Factors contributing to complications were identified using Multivariate Logistic Regression. An XGBoost model and SHAP analysis were employed to predict and interpret complication risks.
Results:
The success rate for one-time catheter insertion was 95.45%, the mean indwelling time was 7.31 ± 0.27 days, and the overall complication rate was 15.15%, with accidental catheter dislodgement occurring in 9.09% of cases. Independent risk factors for complications included non-standard catheterization, preterm birth, lower birth weight, and a lower 1 min Apgar score. The XGBoost model performed well in predicting complications, with SHAP analysis identifying non-standard technique and birth weight as predominant influences.
Conclusion:
Bedside real-time US is shown to be a safe and accurate procedure for UVC placement in neonates. While this study did not include a direct comparison group, the high success and low complication rates align with literature suggesting that US can improve accuracy and potentially decrease radiation exposure compared to routine X-ray verification. The observed improvements are inferred through comparisons with external literature; therefore, further randomized controlled trials are needed to quantify its superiority over X-ray guidance.

