Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Global evidence on the cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure: a systematic review
Kaltrina Bajraktari1, Zanfina Ademi2,3, Artan Bajraktari4,5
1Faculty of Economy, AAB College, Prishtina, Kosovo.
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a cost-effective treatment for heart failure patients. CRT-P offers high value, while CRT-D is best for select high-risk individuals, improving outcomes and healthcare economics.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Economics
- Medical Technology Assessment
Background:
- Heart failure (HF) presents a significant global health burden with high mortality and costs.
- Despite advancements, HF management remains challenging, necessitating evaluation of treatment cost-effectiveness.
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves outcomes but incurs substantial healthcare expenses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CRT compared to standard optimal medical therapy (OMT).
- To assess the economic value of CRT in patients with heart failure who remain symptomatic on OMT.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was performed across major databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus) from 2004 to 2025.
- Included studies reported economic outcomes (QALYs, ICERs) comparing CRT + OMT vs. OMT alone, and CRT-P vs. CRT-D.
- Costs were standardized to 2024 euros and evaluated against country-specific willingness-to-pay thresholds.
Main Results:
- Eighteen studies were included, demonstrating CRT + OMT as highly cost-effective, with ICERs ranging from €3,048-€71,447/QALY gained.
- CRT-D showed variable cost-effectiveness (€24,909-€105,572/QALY gained), often exceeding willingness-to-pay thresholds compared to CRT-P.
- CRT-P emerged as a consistently cost-effective option across various settings.
Conclusions:
- CRT, especially CRT-P, is a cost-effective intervention for symptomatic heart failure patients on OMT.
- CRT-D's cost-effectiveness is variable, suggesting its use should be reserved for specific high-risk patient groups.
- Prioritizing CRT-P aligns with delivering high-value care in advanced heart failure management.
Background And Aim:
Heart failure (HF) remains a global public health challenge, with high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs despite advances in pharmacological and interventional therapies. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces symptoms, hospitalizations, and mortality, but is associated with increased healthcare costs. This review aims to evaluate the existing evidence on the cost-effectiveness of CRT compared with standard optimal medical therapy.
Methods:
A systematic search of Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus was conducted from January 2004 up to July 2025 to identify studies reporting economic outcomes such as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for CRT treatment in addition to optimal medical therapy (OMT) compared to OMT only. The study was registered in PROSPERO. We included studies comparing CRT plus OMT with OMT alone, as well as CRT-P vs. CRT-D. Costs were converted to 2024 euros (€) and assessed against country-specific willingness-to-pay thresholds.
Results:
Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final review CRT + OMT proved to be highly cost-effective across multiple healthcare settings: ICERs ranged from €3,048-€71,447/QALY gained. CRT-D compared with CRT-P showed more cost variability, with ICERs varying between €24,909-€105,572/QALY gained, often exceeding accepted country-specific willingness-to-pay thresholds.
Conclusions:
This review confirms that CRT, particularly CRT-P, is a cost-effective treatment for patients with HFrEF who remain symptomatic despite OMT. CRT-D had variable cost-effectiveness, thus should be reserved for selected high-risk patients. These findings support prioritizing CRT-P as a high-value therapy within advanced heart failure care.
Systematic Review Registration:
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD420251171292, PROSPERO CRD420251171292.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
