Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

A Combined 3D Tissue Engineered In Vitro/In Silico Lung Tumor Model for Predicting Drug Effectiveness in Specific Mutational Backgrounds
Published on: April 6, 2016
Tumor-Specific Success Probabilities and Factors Associated With Phase III Trials in Oncology Drug Development
Keiko Yamamoto1,2, Aya Iwase1, Hideki Maeda1
1Regulatory Science, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract:
Despite advances in novel therapeutic modalities, such as molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapies, the probability of success in Phase III oncology trials remains low. This study quantitatively characterized success probabilities of Phase III trials in oncology drug development and evaluated the factors associated with trial success. Phase III interventional oncology drug trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov between 2007 and 2023 with publicly available primary endpoint results were included. Trial success was defined as the achievement of at least one primary endpoint, and tumor-specific success probabilities were calculated. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the association between trial success and key trial characteristics. We analyzed 824 trials (358 successful and 466 unsuccessful). Overall success probabilities were comparable between solid tumors and hematologic malignancies, although substantial heterogeneity was observed across solid tumors, with particularly low success probabilities for central nervous system tumors and pancreatic cancer. Multivariable analyses showed that biomarker-based patient selection, more recently initiated trials, line of therapy, and the number of primary endpoints were associated with trial success. Trials evaluating molecularly targeted therapies and those with short-term evaluable endpoints showed higher success probabilities, whereas trials evaluating chemotherapy or assessing overall or event-free survival endpoints showed lower success probabilities. Phase III trial success in oncology is associated with tumor-specific characteristics and development-stage factors, including biomarker-based patient selection and trial design. These results provide quantitative evidence to inform decision-making and trial design in oncology drug development.
Insights
Phase III oncology trial success is low but influenced by factors like biomarker selection and trial design. Understanding these elements can improve drug development success rates.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Trials
- Drug Development
Background:
- Phase III oncology trials have a low success rate despite advances in targeted therapies and immunotherapies.
- Quantitative characterization of success probabilities and associated factors in oncology drug development is needed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantitatively assess Phase III oncology trial success probabilities.
- To identify factors associated with trial success in oncology drug development.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 824 Phase III interventional oncology trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (2007-2023) with available primary endpoint results.
- Definition of trial success as achieving at least one primary endpoint.
- Multivariable logistic regression to identify associations between trial success and characteristics like patient selection, trial initiation date, therapy type, and endpoints.
Main Results:
- Overall success probabilities were similar for solid tumors and hematologic malignancies, but varied significantly by specific solid tumor types (e.g., low for CNS and pancreatic cancers).
- Biomarker-based patient selection, recent trial initiation, specific lines of therapy, and fewer primary endpoints were linked to higher success.
- Molecularly targeted therapies and short-term endpoints showed higher success rates, while chemotherapy and overall/event-free survival endpoints had lower success rates.
Conclusions:
- Phase III oncology trial success is influenced by tumor-specific characteristics and development factors.
- Biomarker-based patient selection and optimized trial design are crucial for improving oncology drug development success.
- Quantitative insights can inform decision-making and enhance future trial designs in oncology.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Cancer Survival Analysis
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Cancer
Tumor Immunotherapy
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
