Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

10:50
A Finite Element Approach for Locating the Center of Resistance of Maxillary Teeth
Published on: April 8, 2020
Maxillary sinus morphometry and root-sinus proximity in the posterior maxilla: a CBCT study.
1Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia. mimadi@iau.edu.sa.
The Saudi Dental Journal
|June 8, 2026
Summary
Maxillary sinus dimensions show significant sexual dimorphism, with males having larger measurements. Molar root lengths are similar between sexes, but sinus height near roots varies by proximity category.
Area of Science:
- Dentistry
- Radiology
- Anatomy
Background:
- Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is crucial for assessing maxillary sinus anatomy.
- Understanding maxillary sinus dimensions and root proximity is vital for dental implantology and sinus augmentation procedures.
- Sexual dimorphism in craniofacial structures, including the maxillary sinus, is well-documented.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify maxillary sinus dimensions (anteroposterior, mediolateral, superior-inferior) at 5 mm and 10 mm above the sinus floor using CBCT.
- To compare these dimensions between sexes.
- To classify posterior molar root-sinus relationships using the Tian classification and assess if sinus dimensions differ across these categories.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study analyzed 120 CBCT scans (62 males, 58 females).
- Maxillary sinus dimensions were measured bilaterally at 5 mm and 10 mm above the sinus floor.
- Posterior molar root-sinus proximity was categorized using the Tian classification (IS/CO/OS).
- Statistical analyses included independent-samples t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc comparisons.
Main Results:
- Males exhibited significantly larger maxillary sinus dimensions (AP, ML, SI) than females at both reference levels (p ≤ 0.022 on the right; p ≤ 0.007 on the left).
- Molar root lengths were comparable between sexes, except for the right second molar, which was longer in males.
- The superior-inferior (SI) height at 5 mm showed consistent associations with Tian proximity categories, with Type OS demonstrating lower values than Type CO and Type IS.
Conclusions:
- Maxillary sinus dimensions display significant sexual dimorphism, with males generally having larger measurements.
- Molar root lengths are largely similar between sexes, but root-sinus proximity influences sinus morphometry, particularly SI height.
- Sex-specific anatomical considerations are important for optimizing CBCT assessments in posterior maxilla procedures like sinus augmentation and implant surgery.
