Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
Actuarial Approach01:20

Actuarial Approach

The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Radiologic Pattern of Fibrosis in Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema: Impact on Disease Trajectories and Prognostic Outcomes.

Radiology·2026
Same author

Clinical implications of plasma EGFR T790M and ctDNA shedding across metastatic sites in plasma- or tissue-confirmed EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer treated with lazertinib: a prospective multicenter cohort study.

Translational lung cancer research·2026
Same author

Protocol Development for the Korean Survey for Cancer Survivorship and Preliminary Analysis of Employment Change's Impact on Quality of Life and Psychological Health.

Cancers·2026
Same author

Epidemiology of Gastric Cancer in Korea (1999-2022): Incidence, Survival, and 5-Year Conditional Relative Survival.

Journal of gastric cancer·2026
Same author

Clinical implications of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cellular analysis in fibrotic interstitial lung disease combined with CT quantification.

Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease·2025
Same author

Updates on incidence, mortality and survival of liver cancer using Korea central cancer registry database: 1999-2022.

Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery·2025
Same journal

Multimodule Human-Artificial Intelligence Collaboration Pipeline for Large Language Model-Assisted Thematic Analysis Across Digital Health Interview Studies: Comparative Evaluation Study.

JMIR medical informatics·2026
Same journal

Graph Network Feature Space Fusion for Predicting Irregularly Sampled Medical Time-Series Data: Deep Learning Model Development and Validation Study.

JMIR medical informatics·2026
Same journal

Intrasystem Repeatability of S-Detect for Breast Ultrasound Classification With Identical Static Images: Single-Center Retrospective Repeatability Study.

JMIR medical informatics·2026
Same journal

Clinician Perspectives on Ambient AI Scribes in the Intensive Care Unit: Qualitative Interview Study.

JMIR medical informatics·2026
Same journal

IdeaDistiller-AI Support for Idea Synthesis in Concept Mapping: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.

JMIR medical informatics·2026
Same journal

Pregnancy-Related Clinical Codes in Unlikely Populations in Primary Care.

JMIR medical informatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

Predicting 5-Year Mortality in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Using the Korean Central Cancer Registry: Model Development

Jong Hyuk Lee1, Ho Cheol Kim2, Kyu-Won Jung3

  • 1Department of Oncology, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

JMIR Medical Informatics
|June 8, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Deep learning models accurately predict 5-year mortality in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with tumor stage being the most critical factor. These models offer clinically interpretable insights for improved patient care and risk assessment.

Keywords:
KCCRKorean Central Cancer Registrydeep learningmachine learningnon–small-cell lung cancerpermutation testsprognosis

More Related Videos

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Medical Informatics
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a major cause of cancer mortality, necessitating accurate prognostic prediction.
  • Machine learning (ML) shows promise for prognosis assessment, but integrating high discrimination with clinical interpretability remains a challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop deep learning (DL) models for predicting 5-year mortality in NSCLC patients.
  • To quantify feature importance using permutation testing for clinical interpretability.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from 3144 NSCLC patients including clinical, pulmonary function, histological, genomic, and staging details.
  • Developed and tuned five DL models using Hyperband, evaluating performance with AUC, accuracy, F1-score, and Brier score.
  • Assessed feature importance via groupwise permutation testing and concordance using the Friedman test.

Main Results:

  • All five DL models achieved comparable discrimination (AUC=0.875-0.879), with the primary model reaching an AUC of 0.879.
  • Tumor stage significantly impacted prediction (AUC decrease of 0.217), followed by pulmonary function tests (0.016).
  • Gene mutation importance varied, being higher in adenocarcinoma subsets; feature importance rankings were consistent across models (P=.93).

Conclusions:

  • A grouped-input DL framework demonstrated performance comparable to Cox models for NSCLC 5-year mortality prediction.
  • Group-level permutation importance offers stable, reproducible insights into risk factors, aiding clinical decision-making and model refinement.