Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026
A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
Implementation of Evidence-Based, Person-Centered Alternative Delivery Models for Cardiac Rehabilitation in a Rural
Alline Beleigoli1, Maria Alejandra Pinero de Plaza2, Lemlem G Gebremichael2
1Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Background & Aims:
Access and adherence to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) remain suboptimal, particularly in rural and remote settings. This study evaluated the implementation of person-centred, evidence-based CR delivery model tailored to improve access and completion.
Methods:
The implementation framework utilised was the Model for Large-Scale Knowledge Translation. The Country Heart Attack Prevention (CHAP) project introduced evidence-based flexible CR including, face-to-face, telehealth, telephone, web-based and primary care options. A matched prospective cohort compared CR attendance, completion (primary outcomes), cardiovascular (CV) readmissions, mortality, and emergency department (ED) visits between CHAP rural services and standard metropolitan face-to-face CR.
Results:
CR attendance was comparable between groups (24.2% vs 23.8%; odds ratio [OR] 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-1.47; p=0.16), but completion rates were significantly higher in the CHAP Project (77.1% vs 57.5%; OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.30-2.18; p<0.001). Patient satisfaction was also greater (85.9% vs 77.1%; p<0.001). Median waiting times were similar (38 vs 36 days; p=0.008). Alternative delivery models were equivalent to traditional face-to-face modes for CV readmissions (hazard ratio [HR] 1.19; 95% CI 0.96-1.49; p=0.17), CV mortality (HR 1.70; 95% CI 0.92-3.16; p=0.09), and ED visits (HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.94-1.21; p=0.33). CR completion through CHAP was cheaper and more effective (costs: $6,542 vs $8,689; completions: 77.1% vs 57.5%). The CHAP model had over 50% probability of being cost-effective in improving CR completion. Uptake of the CHAP model would result in a cost reduction ranging from $2 million (m) at 20% uptake to $10m if all patients referred attended and completed CR.
Conclusions:
The CHAP Project significantly improved program completion and achieved satisfaction without compromising clinical outcomes and showed important levels of economic benefit. Broader implementation of person-centred models of CR, across all geographic areas to enhance uptake and impact of CR in underserved populations is recommended.
Related Concept Videos
01:29Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
01:30Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
01:30Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
01:27Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
01:27Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
01:26Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...