Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bone-Conducted Responses Using the Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response Paradigm.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same author

The parallel auditory brainstem response paradigm provides accurate and fast hearing thresholds in a clinic-like setting.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same author

Bone conducted responses using the parallel auditory brainstem response (pABR) paradigm.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Speech Perception Outcomes in Children With Single-Sided Deafness Receiving Unilateral Cochlear Implantation Compared to Bimodal Device Users.

Ear and hearing·2025
Same author

The auditory brainstem response to natural speech is not affected by selective attention.

PLoS biology·2025
Same author

The Effect of Speech Masking on the Human Subcortical Response to Continuous Speech.

eNeuro·2025
Same journal

Community-Informed Adaptation of a School-Based Hearing Health Intervention: Formative Evaluation for an Effectiveness-Implementation Trial.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Hearing Difficulty, Health Literacy, and Poorer Health Among Adults in the United States: 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Study.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Cultural Differences in Listening Environments Between Hispanic and White Non-Hispanic Cochlear Implant Users.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Detection of Inner Ear Malformations Based on Simple Anatomical Measurements: A Model Approach.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Avoiding Cisplatin-Related Hearing Loss, Including Implementing Sodium Thiosulfate as Otoprotectant Into Daily Pediatric Clinical Practice: Proceedings Based on Evidence and Expert Opinion From the Ototoxicity Taskforce of the SIOP Supportive Care Network.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Quantifying Miscommunications in Triadic Conversations: Effects of Hearing Impairment, Hearing Aids, and Background Noise.

Ear and hearing·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Data Acquisition and Analysis In Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry In Mice
08:51

Data Acquisition and Analysis In Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry In Mice

Published on: May 10, 2019

Characterizing Simultaneously Recorded Auditory Brainstem and Middle Latency Responses Using the Parallel Auditory

Isabel N Herb1, Melissa J Polonenko

  • 1Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Ear and Hearing
|June 9, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Simultaneous auditory brainstem response (ABR) and middle latency response (MLR) recordings using the parallel ABR (pABR) method reliably capture key ABR and MLR waves. This approach offers a more comprehensive hearing assessment with robust wave identification.

Keywords:
Auditory brainstem responseAuditory evoked potentialElectroencephalographyMiddle latency responseParallel auditory brainstem responseSuprathreshold auditory responses

More Related Videos

Semi-Automated Analysis of Peak Amplitude and Latency for Auditory Brainstem Response Waveforms Using R
06:01

Semi-Automated Analysis of Peak Amplitude and Latency for Auditory Brainstem Response Waveforms Using R

Published on: December 9, 2022

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations
06:34

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Published on: July 1, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Data Acquisition and Analysis In Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry In Mice
08:51

Data Acquisition and Analysis In Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry In Mice

Published on: May 10, 2019

Semi-Automated Analysis of Peak Amplitude and Latency for Auditory Brainstem Response Waveforms Using R
06:01

Semi-Automated Analysis of Peak Amplitude and Latency for Auditory Brainstem Response Waveforms Using R

Published on: December 9, 2022

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations
06:34

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Published on: July 1, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Audiology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Auditory brainstem response (ABR) and middle latency response (MLR) are crucial for hearing assessment.
  • Current clinical practices often require separate recordings for ABR and MLR due to differing optimal parameters.
  • The parallel ABR (pABR) paradigm enables simultaneous, multi-frequency ABR acquisition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility of simultaneously recording ABR and MLR using the pABR paradigm.
  • To characterize ABR and MLR responses at near- and suprathreshold levels with pABR parameters.
  • To establish normative data for MLRs obtained through this simultaneous recording method.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized an open dataset of pABR recordings from 20 normal-hearing adults.
  • Stimuli included tone-pips at five frequencies, six presentation rates, and two intensity levels.
  • Analyzed ABR waves (I, III, V) and MLR waves (P0, Na, Pa, Nb, Pb) for presence, latency, and amplitude via linear mixed-effect modeling.

Main Results:

  • ABR wave V and MLR waves Na and Pa demonstrated consistent identifiability and significant amplitude across tested conditions.
  • Amplitude of ABR wave V was more sensitive to frequency and rate changes compared to MLR peaks.
  • MLR peak amplitudes and latencies remained relatively stable across moderate and low stimulus levels.

Conclusions:

  • pABR-optimized parameters yield robust and consistently identifiable ABR wave V and MLR waves Na and Pa.
  • Simultaneous ABR/MLR recording can comprehensively assess auditory function across different neural pathways.
  • This integrated approach may enhance threshold estimation, particularly for low-frequency hearing loss detection.