Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Characterization of pH-Dependent Reversible Self-Assembly of Amyloid Beta 1-40-Coated Gold Colloids
Published on: March 21, 2025
The Monomeric Conformational Ensembles of Aβ40 and Aβ42 Encode Their Differential Amyloid Aggregation Propensity
Irene Cadenelli1, Andrea Ciccolo2, Andrea Tagliabue1
1Department of Physics, University of Genoa, Genoa 16146, Italy.
Abstract:
Aβ40 and Aβ42 peptides differ by just two C-terminal residues, yet they display strikingly different aggregation and toxicity profiles. Whether this distinction is already encoded at the monomer level is still under debate. Here, we combine extensive all-atom simulations in explicit solvent, well-tempered metadynamics, and a tailored consensus cluster analysis to compare the monomeric ensembles of the two isoforms under identical conditions. Both peptides populate broad, coil-like conformational distributions; however, Aβ42 shows a systematically higher β-structure propensity, especially in the C-terminal region, and samples more extended conformations with higher hydrophobic exposure compared to Aβ40. These results support a mechanistic link between sequence-encoded monomer conformational preferences and the differential amyloidogenicity of the two isoforms, highlighting monomer-level determinants of Aβ42's distinct aggregation behavior.
Related Concept Videos
Amyloid Fibrils
Amyloid deposits were observed as early as 1639 in the liver and the spleen. In 1854, Rudolph Virchow performed iodine staining, normally used to...
Amyloid Fibrils
Amyloid deposits were observed as early as 1639 in the liver and the spleen. In 1854, Rudolph Virchow performed iodine staining, normally used to...
Protein Folding
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

