Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Implantation of the Syncardia Total Artificial Heart
Published on: July 18, 2014
Survival Outcomes in Middle-Aged and Older Patients With Advanced Heart Failure: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of
Nir Uriel1, Gabriel T Sayer1, Paolo C Colombo1
1Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Insights
Heart transplantation (HT) shows higher survival post-procedure than HeartMate 3 (HM3) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) use. However, HM3 offers better survival when accounting for HT waitlist time, especially in middle-aged patients with advanced heart failure.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Transplantation Medicine
Background:
- Heart failure (HF) prevalence increases with age, necessitating advanced treatment options.
- Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) and heart transplantation (HT) improve survival and quality of life in advanced HF.
- Optimal therapy comparison between LVADs and HT in older adults remains controversial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare survival and adverse events in middle-aged and older adults with advanced HF.
- To evaluate outcomes for patients receiving the HeartMate 3 (HM3) LVAD versus those listed for or undergoing HT.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 1,763 patients from the MOMENTUM 3 HM3 cohort and 5,336 from the UNOS registry (2014-2018).
- Propensity score matching was used to adjust for baseline differences between groups.
- Outcomes assessed included 2-year survival and 1-year major adverse events (stroke, renal dysfunction, infection).
Main Results:
- Heart transplantation (HT) showed higher 2-year survival post-treatment compared to HM3 LVAD use in both middle-aged and older groups.
- When including pre-HT waitlist time, HM3 demonstrated superior survival compared to survival free from delisting due to deterioration in middle-aged HT candidates.
- For older adults, HM3 survival was numerically higher than HT candidates when waitlist time was considered (76.6% vs 72.2%).
Conclusions:
- While HT offers better immediate post-treatment survival, HM3 LVAD therapy provides comparable or superior survival when pre-transplant waitlist time is factored in.
- The findings highlight the critical importance of considering waitlist duration when discussing advanced heart failure treatment strategies.
- HM3 LVAD therapy is a viable alternative to HT, particularly for patients facing long waitlist periods.
Background:
Heart failure (HF) increases in prevalence with age. For patients with advanced HF, both durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) and heart transplantation (HT) can improve longevity and quality of life. However, comparing optimal outcomes between the 2 therapies in middle-aged and older patients who are eligible for both remains controversial.
Objectives:
This study aims to report survival and adverse events in middle-aged (50-64 years of age) and older (≥65 years of age) adults with advanced HF who received the HeartMate 3 (HM3) (Abbott) LVAD or were listed for or underwent HT.
Methods:
The authors analyzed patients from the MOMENTUM 3 IDE (Multi-Center Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing MCS [Mechanical Circulatory Support] Therapy with HeartMate 3 IDE [Investigational Device Exemption] Protocol; and MOMENTUM 3 CAP [Continued Access Protocol]) HM3 cohort (N = 1,763) and the UNOS (United Network for Organ Sharing) registry (N = 5,336) from 2014 to 2018, by using propensity score matching to adjust for baseline differences. Outcomes included 2-year survival from treatment or listing and 1-year major adverse events (ie, stroke, renal dysfunction, infection-related hospitalization).
Results:
After matching, HT demonstrated higher 2-year survival when measured from treatment (middle-aged group: 90.7% vs 83.8%; HR: 1.76; P = 0.0004; older group: 87.5% vs 77.7%; HR: 1.89; P < 0.0001). However, when incorporating the waitlist period, HM3 survival was higher compared with survival free from delisting resulting from deterioration in middle-aged HT candidates (83.0% vs 75.0%; HR: 0.62; P < 0.0001). Among older adults, accounting for the waitlist resulted in numerically higher HM3 survival relative to HT candidates (76.6% vs 72.2%; HR: 0.81; P = 0.064).
Conclusions:
The 2-year survival was higher post-HT compared with HM3 use; however, when including pre-HT waitlist time, HM3 therapy demonstrated higher survival than survival free from delisting resulting from deterioration in HT candidates. These findings underscore the importance of considering wait time when discussing advanced HF therapies. (Multi-Center Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing MCS [Mechanical Circulatory Support] Therapy with HeartMate 3 IDE [Investigational Device Exemption] Protocol [MOMENTUM 3 IDE]; NCT02224755; and Continued Access Protocol [MOMENTUM 3 CAP]; NCT02892955).
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy

