Denominator bias in MENA MASLD epidemiology: A call for decision-grade surveillance

Mohamed El-Kassas1,2, Khalid M AlNaamani2,3, Faisal M Sanai2,4

  • 1Department of Endemic Medicine, Capital University (Formerly Helwan University), Cairo, Egypt.

Insights

Estimates of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in the Middle East and North Africa are biased by sampling and referral issues. Addressing these biases requires better population denominators for accurate MENA MASLD epidemiology.

Area of Science:

  • Hepatology and Gastroenterology
  • Public Health and Epidemiology
  • Metabolic Disorders

Background:

  • Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a growing public health concern in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region.
  • Current prevalence and outcome data for MASLD in MENA are unreliable due to inconsistent population denominator definitions.
  • Systematic biases in epidemiological studies distort the understanding of MASLD's true burden in the region.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and analyze the key mechanisms causing systematic bias in MENA MASLD epidemiology.
  • To propose actionable strategies for improving the accuracy of MASLD prevalence and outcome estimations in the MENA region.
  • To advocate for the development of "decision-grade denominators" for robust national surveillance and resource allocation.

Main Methods:

  • Perspective piece analyzing existing literature and epidemiological methodologies for MASLD in the MENA region.
  • Identification of three primary interacting mechanisms driving epidemiological bias: distorted sampling frames, referral pathway selection, and undercapture of specific populations.
  • Discussion of how nomenclature changes and data system limitations contribute to bias.

Main Results:

  • Epidemiological data are often derived from urban, tertiary care settings, overrepresenting advanced disease and underrepresenting milder forms and rural populations.
  • Risk stratification pathways and data system inconsistencies (coding, documentation) further introduce artefactual errors and complicate trend interpretation.
  • Underdiagnosis and under-recording in primary care significantly propagate bias in downstream estimates.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate MASLD epidemiology in MENA is hampered by biased data collection and definition of population denominators.
  • Recommendations include probability-based sampling, inclusion of rural/displaced populations, data linkage across healthcare settings, and harmonized terminology.
  • Implementing denominator-focused actions is crucial for reliable national surveillance, resource allocation, and clinical trial readiness.

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Principles of Disease Surveillance01:26

Principles of Disease Surveillance

Disease surveillance is the systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of health data essential to the planning, implementation, and evaluation of public health practice. This process integrates data dissemination to entities responsible for preventing and controlling disease, injury, and disability. Surveillance systems provide crucial information for action, helping public health authorities make informed decisions to manage and prevent outbreaks, ensure public safety, optimize...
Amebiasis01:28

Amebiasis

Entamoeba histolytica, a protozoan parasite, is responsible for intestinal and extraintestinal amebiasis. Though a significant proportion of infections remain asymptomatic, approximately 50 million individuals annually are estimated to present with clinical disease, resulting in up to 100,000 deaths globally. The disease burden is disproportionately high in regions with lower socioeconomic status, such as parts of India, Africa, Mexico, and Latin America.Etiology and TransmissionThe infective...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
Introduction to Epidemiology01:26

Introduction to Epidemiology

Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...