Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology
Published on: May 26, 2015
Sinus rhythm duration after direct current cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation and long-term outcomes
Pok-Tin Tang1,2, Alexandre Almorad3, Giampaolo Vetta3
1Oxford Heart Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Insights
Shorter sinus rhythm (SR) duration after direct current cardioversion (DCCV) before catheter ablation (CA) for persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) did not predict long-term AF recurrence. However, shorter SR duration was linked to arrhythmias during the post-CA blanking period.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Research
Background:
- Persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) patients undergoing catheter ablation (CA) often experience high rates of recurrence.
- Direct current cardioversion (DCCV) is frequently used before CA, but its effectiveness in maintaining sinus rhythm (SR) varies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between shorter SR duration post-DCCV and the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after subsequent CA.
Main Methods:
- International multicentre retrospective study of 938 patients undergoing first-time CA for PsAF with prior DCCV (2015-2024).
- Patients categorized by post-DCCV SR duration: <7 days, 7-31 days, and >31 days.
- Primary outcome: freedom from atrial arrhythmia post-CA (after 56-day blanking period).
Main Results:
- No significant difference in long-term freedom from atrial arrhythmia among groups (log-rank p=0.10).
- No association found between post-DCCV SR duration and time to first atrial arrhythmia recurrence (HR 1.00, p=0.07).
- Significantly more blanking period arrhythmias in patients with <7 and 7-31 days SR duration compared to >31 days (pairwise p<0.001).
Conclusions:
- Shorter SR duration post-DCCV is linked to blanking period arrhythmias but not long-term AF recurrence after CA for PsAF.
- Findings may aid clinicians in assessing CA suitability and predicting long-term success.
Background:
Patients undergoing catheter ablation (CA) for persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) experience high rates of AF recurrence. Direct current cardioversion (DCCV) is often performed prior to CA, with variable post-DCCV duration of sinus rhythm (SR).
Objective:
We aimed to determine whether shorter SR duration after DCCV is associated with AF recurrence after subsequent CA.
Methods:
We performed an international multicentre retrospective study of patients undergoing first-time CA for PsAF between 2015 and 2024 with a prior DCCV. SR duration after the last DCCV preceding CA was recorded. The primary outcome was freedom from atrial arrhythmia after CA (after a 56-day postablation blanking period).
Results:
938 patients undergoing first-time CA for PsAF were identified from six centres and categorised by post-DCCV SR duration: <7 days (group 1, n=212); 7-31 days (group 2, n=236); and >31 days (group 3, n=490). Over median post-CA follow-up of 511 days, 512 patients (55%) experienced atrial arrhythmia recurrence. There was no significant between-group difference in freedom from atrial arrhythmia (log-rank p=0.10). When analysed as a continuous variable in a Cox regression model, there was no association between post-DCCV SR duration and time to first recurrence of atrial arrhythmia (HR per 10-day increment 1.00, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.01, p=0.07). In secondary analyses, there were significantly more blanking period arrhythmias in groups 1 and 2 compared with group 3 (both pairwise p<0.001), and presentation for CA in persistent atrial arrhythmia was associated with a time-dependent increased risk of atrial arrhythmia recurrence compared with presentation in SR.
Conclusion:
In this large multicentre cohort, shorter duration of SR after DCCV was associated with blanking period arrhythmia after subsequent CA, but we did not find evidence of an association with long-term AF recurrence. Clinicians should consider these findings when making decisions regarding suitability for CA or predicting long-term CA success.
More Related Videos
08:42Cox-Maze IV Procedure Concomitant with Valvular Surgery In Situs Inversus Dextrocardia: A Single-Center Experience in China
Published on: February 11, 2022
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias I: Sinus Arrhythmias
Types of Arrhythmias
Sinus Node Arrhythmias
Sinus Bradycardia: Originating from the sinoatrial (SA) node, sinus bradycardia involves slower impulses, resulting in a heart rate of less than 60 beats per minute (bpm). Causes include sleep, vagal stimulation, beta-blockers, hypothyroidism, and...
Dysrhythmias III: Characteristics of Dysrhythmias