Balancing the impact of socio-ethical and economic considerations on clinical-hospital decision-making
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Royi Barnea1,2, Aviad Tur-Sinai3, Orna Tal4,5,6
1Assuta Health Services Research Institute, Assuta Medical Centers, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Background:
Healthcare systems increasingly operate under chronic scarcity, requiring prioritisation decisions beyond formal coverage policies and bedside clinical judgment. While much of the ethical literature on priority setting has focused on macro-level allocation or individual clinician decision-making, comparatively limited attention has been devoted to the meso level, where senior hospital medical managers shape access through implicit operational decisions under sustained constraint.
Methods:
This study examines how senior medical managers approach prioritisation when clinical need, prognosis, and expected benefit are held constant. Using structured allocation scenarios that vary only in socio-ethical and economic patient characteristics, we conceptually distinguish between the practical acceptability of non-clinical criteria and their perceived normative legitimacy. Eighty-two senior medical managers participate.
Results:
Most respondents appear to reject explicit prioritisation under scarcity, endorsing equal treatment even when resources are insufficient. When prioritisation occurs, younger patients are more frequently favoured, typically on clinical rather than on economic grounds. Economic determinants, including reimbursement status, insurance coverage, and anticipated downstream costs, were rarely endorsed as explicit prioritization criteria despite participants' simultaneous recognition of responsibility for departmental sustainability.
Conclusions:
These findings suggest a structured moral tension at the meso level. Economic constraints may be reframed through clinically grounded justifications, potentially obscuring underlying value tradeoffs, while non-prioritisation itself emerges as an ethically meaningful stance with distributive consequences. Using acceptability and legitimacy as a conceptual lens, this study underscores the need for transparent, procedurally robust approaches to hospital-level prioritisation under chronic scarcity.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Dilemmas II
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Ethics and Bioethics
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's cancer...
Ethical Standards I
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...